Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015, Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher
#2976
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Ugh, Tatooine again? The universe has to be larger. That said, I wouldn't mind seeing Hoth again or Yavin IV.
#2979
DVD Talk Limited Edition
#2980
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Then that would ruin the fucking continuity with the OT.
#2981
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
A photo alleged to be from the location in Abu Dhabi (likely filling in for Tatooine) was published by newspaper The National a couple days ago.
![](http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/screencrush.com/files/2014/04/swset-4.jpg)
Not much to see, but notice the giant round structure blocking the entrance. Folks are speculating it's the foot of an Imperial Walker. Zooming in and comparing it to reference photos of the vehicle, it appears they might be right.
![](http://wac.450f.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/screencrush.com/files/2014/04/swset-4.jpg)
Not much to see, but notice the giant round structure blocking the entrance. Folks are speculating it's the foot of an Imperial Walker. Zooming in and comparing it to reference photos of the vehicle, it appears they might be right.
Spoiler:
Maybe they're doing a homage to that scene?
#2982
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
I know there are huge legal issues that are stopping this release from Disney, but putting that aside, the perfect time to release the OOT would be during the hype of Episode 7 next year.
Think about it, they are going to go heavy on focusing on Luke, Leia and Han in every trailer and every interview on Late Night shows, so what better time to release the OOT to coincide with it?
The good thing is I've been disappointed so many times by this franchise in the past 17 years, so I am not getting my hopes up anymore.
Think about it, they are going to go heavy on focusing on Luke, Leia and Han in every trailer and every interview on Late Night shows, so what better time to release the OOT to coincide with it?
The good thing is I've been disappointed so many times by this franchise in the past 17 years, so I am not getting my hopes up anymore.
The only issue is that Fox will continue to get a cut of the home video sales until Disney can buy them off. It may stick in Disney's craw that Fox will get a piece of that pie, but it's not really a "legal issue".
#2983
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Formerly known as "Jeffy Pop"/Denver
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Like everyone else, I'm bored of Tattooine, but I have to admit, the idea of seeing an AT-AT in a desert landscape is kinda cool.
#2984
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
#2985
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
What if they're Ewok terrorists who want revenge against the New Republic because the Death Star's destruction rained billions of tons of radioactive debris upon Endor, destroying the ecosystem and causing mass famine. Maybe that desert scene actually is Endor, and that's the foot is a remnant of the battle where the Ewoks plan to execute Han and Leia's children as part of their revenge -- wouldn't that be frickin' awesome?
#2987
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
This is a place holder for if I ever think of anything positive to post about JJ Abrams or Star Wars.
#2988
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Dark Empire comic is OOP? Luke taking down an AT-AT on Tatooine using the Force sounds awesome.
I wonder if Leia will get a lightsaber.
I wonder if Leia will get a lightsaber.
#2989
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Yeah. That always sounded cool to me. Never saw the comic but the idea that Luke could do that always looked cool in my head.
#2990
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Maybe the new characters save Ewoks from chemical testing labs. Since Ewoks can't blink, they're perfect for the "eye" tests.
I'd love some scenes took place on Hoth -- my favorite planet in all the movies... but please, no more Tatooine.
I'd love some scenes took place on Hoth -- my favorite planet in all the movies... but please, no more Tatooine.
#2991
Banned
#2992
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
![Smilie](/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I know the fandom take on Dark Empire seems to run either love it or hate (with no in-between opinions), I'm plainly on the love it side. I'm actually in the middle of a re-read of part II, and if anything, I'd love to see a revisited, expanded version. As it stands, all three stories rush over a lot of things and and refer to offscreen events. A used bookstore will likely be your best bet to find them, be sure to look for the version of part 2 that includes the third part, Empire's End. It's otherwise impossible to find on its own.
#2993
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Dark Empire is one of the most controversial of the Star Wars EU because
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
#2995
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
What legal issues? Disney owns Lucasfilm. Fox has the home video distribution rights. Disney says "release the originals on Blu", Fox says "okey dokey". The only issue is that Fox will continue to get a cut of the home video sales until Disney can buy them off. It may stick in Disney's craw that Fox will get a piece of that pie, but it's not really a "legal issue".
Last edited by hanshotfirst1138; 04-20-14 at 09:07 PM.
#2996
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Part of the Left-Wing Conspiracy
Posts: 7,538
Received 203 Likes
on
117 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Well, there is two thoughts. One Disney could just say to Fox, we aren't gonna release the old movies ever, and it becomes worthless to Fox to keep so Disney can buy them. Or they just buy them out right. Since Fox will hold onto Ep IV forever unless they sell, Disney is gonna have to deal with them at some point.
#2997
DVD Talk Legend & 2021 TOTY Winner
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Disney have not demonstrated and interest in sharing. They pulled the comics license from Dark Horse to move it back to Marvel, they cancelled Clone Wars completely to restart it on the Disney Channel to get it away from Cartoon Network, and they canned the entire Lucasarts division so that they could move it under their own umbrella. Doesn't sound like they'd be willing to compromise much. And that before you even factor in the restoration costs.
#2998
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Ultimately people are assuming that Disney is gonna refuse to approve anything Fox wants to do on video while they have the rights and there's no evidence to suggest that or even support it as a theory.
I would also think that Fox would be in a pretty good position legally if Disney simply refused to approve anything Fox proposed when Fox does still have the rights. An entertainment lawyer would jump at the chance to demonstrate was intentionally making something unreleasable by Fox when they have a legal right to release it, especially when you're dealing with a change of ownership.
The whole point is, its unlikely it would get that far. Disney will indirectly benefit from having these films on video in any form when their new movies come out and they aren't gonna be enter into a big legal mess with Fox.
With Lucas's playing a smaller part in the whole Star Wars machine now there is less opposition to releasing the films in their original forms. Period.
I would also think that Fox would be in a pretty good position legally if Disney simply refused to approve anything Fox proposed when Fox does still have the rights. An entertainment lawyer would jump at the chance to demonstrate was intentionally making something unreleasable by Fox when they have a legal right to release it, especially when you're dealing with a change of ownership.
The whole point is, its unlikely it would get that far. Disney will indirectly benefit from having these films on video in any form when their new movies come out and they aren't gonna be enter into a big legal mess with Fox.
With Lucas's playing a smaller part in the whole Star Wars machine now there is less opposition to releasing the films in their original forms. Period.
#2999
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
I would also think that Fox would be in a pretty good position legally if Disney simply refused to approve anything Fox proposed when Fox does still have the rights. An entertainment lawyer would jump at the chance to demonstrate was intentionally making something unreleasable by Fox when they have a legal right to release it, especially when you're dealing with a change of ownership.
#3000
DVD Talk Legend & 2021 TOTY Winner
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams, S: The casts of Star Trek, Lost, Felicit
Ultimately people are assuming that Disney is gonna refuse to approve anything Fox wants to do on video while they have the rights and there's no evidence to suggest that or even support it as a theory.
I would also think that Fox would be in a pretty good position legally if Disney simply refused to approve anything Fox proposed when Fox does still have the rights. An entertainment lawyer would jump at the chance to demonstrate was intentionally making something unreleasable by Fox when they have a legal right to release it, especially when you're dealing with a change of ownership.
The whole point is, its unlikely it would get that far. Disney will indirectly benefit from having these films on video in any form when their new movies come out and they aren't gonna be enter into a big legal mess with Fox.
With Lucas's playing a smaller part in the whole Star Wars machine now there is less opposition to releasing the films in their original forms. Period.
I would also think that Fox would be in a pretty good position legally if Disney simply refused to approve anything Fox proposed when Fox does still have the rights. An entertainment lawyer would jump at the chance to demonstrate was intentionally making something unreleasable by Fox when they have a legal right to release it, especially when you're dealing with a change of ownership.
The whole point is, its unlikely it would get that far. Disney will indirectly benefit from having these films on video in any form when their new movies come out and they aren't gonna be enter into a big legal mess with Fox.
With Lucas's playing a smaller part in the whole Star Wars machine now there is less opposition to releasing the films in their original forms. Period.
I don't believe that Fox has authority (or even the ability) to restore the OOT on their own though. Disney would have to do the restore, and then give it to Fox to release. The question is, would Disney make the investment to do that when they have to share the profits with Fox, or does it make more sense to them to wait until the majority of the films revert to them?