he had lived this day so many times that he essentially forgot anything about himself

it seems like they could play of the fact that there seems to be 3 different timelines created now. Maybe that creates an instability that needs to be fixed or something.

at one point they show the couple in bed falling asleep together. If person A feel asleep before person B, would person A immediately start their next version of "today"? If so, what happens to person B's perception of person A? Did they disappear? Are they still there, but sleeping? If they are still there, could they have been woken up, and sucked back into the person B's version of today?

When the couple came out finally into tomorrow, would they have been able to find Roy there too? Assuming he eventually was able to use the girls instructions to come out of the time loop, no matter how many days it took, would he still have shown up in the same "tomorrow" as the couple? Or would he be in a different tomorrow? It almost seems like there should be a different tomorrow for each today that was spent in the time loop.

Another hypothetical! The guy said he stayed awake for a couple days on meth before. If he did that after the girl entered the time loop, when he woke up, would the girl have gone through 7 "todays" before the guy showed up again? Or would the guy show up the very next day for the girl? SO many questions!!

I was thinking once you fell asleep or died your consciousness rebooted, and those stuck in the loop restarted the same days again and again at the exact same time - the real bummer in all that is no satisfying sleep (unless you woke up automatically refreshed). Roy should be able to recognize them the next day (since hypothetically, there's no timeline in which he didn't eventually escape.), and when somebody went to sleep I assumed it was like they died to the other people, that or the default timeline version of themselves took over.

I'm convinced June Squibb lures people to the cave to see what kind of wedding speeches they'll give.

We see them happily together in the pool on Nov 10, so they obviously remember everything that happened to them previously. However, when Roy gets her message and seeks him out at the wedding, he doesn't recognize Roy at all.That makes sense because it would have been the first time they met each other, but it doesn't make sense that at the same time the couple are together the next day. Are there now two timelines? One with the couple together and Roy still in the loop, and another with the couple not together but Roy has also escaped the loop?

At the end of the show there are most likely at least 3 timelines:

1. Nyles and Sarah's timeline past the loop
2. Roys timeline past the loop where Nyles and Sarah would not recognize Roy
3. Kind of a sad one, but once Nyles and Sarah escaped the loop it created a new timeline with only Roy still in the loop, and Nyles not in the loop yet. But it is likely that other than the brief encounter with Roy, Niles day went the same as his very first one, which means that Nyles probably goes to the cave and is stuck in the loop in a different timeline all over again
4. It is also possible that the meeting with Roy somehow prevents him from going to the cave which would mean a timeline where no one was ever in a loop.

In terms of the Sarah falling asleep ahead of Nyles question I think she would not disappear in Nyles timeline and could even wake up, but she would only remember in the next day up to the point she fell asleep

A really cool mechanism for a sequel could be all these timelines sort of merging. Could create a lot of cool plots

dinosaurs?

PALM SPRINGS: DINOSAURS EXPLAINED

Sure, adding dinosaurs into the mix makes for some good comedy and imagery, but there’s actually another way their addition to the scene can be read.

This was highlighted by writer Andy Siara in an interview with Decider:

“I could say that you have two characters who don’t believe they are capable of love, and in that moment, maybe they fall in love. Dinosaurs don’t exist, but in that moment, they exist. It’s two things that are impossible.”

It’s a lovely way of interpreting the sequence, although he does also offer an alternative explanation: “Or, I can also just say that I love Jurassic Park and I wanted to put that in there. It felt right in that moment. How do we make this scene stand out more–what better way than to add dinosaurs?”

Both are valid, but we certainly prefer the first reason!