Warner, New Line, Paramount, Universal ... The Studios/Networks Thread - Part 2
#201
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by RockStrongo
This topic is broad enough to cover those who do not like the decision. Its not only for us BD owners.
Besides, what the hell is left to be said about WB going blu? Until there is new info, there really isnt anything.
Besides, what the hell is left to be said about WB going blu? Until there is new info, there really isnt anything.
#202
Suspended
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
I understand that but it seems like some posters are trying to make their case on why people shouldn't go Blu. I like having some type of HDM out there and wish people wouldn't try to downsell it now simply because HD-Dvd wasn't the "chosen" format. I didn't like the fact that the Red Sox won the World Series but I also haven't spent any time on their boards proclaiming why they shouldn't be the champs or why people shouldn't be a fan.
#203
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
I understand that but it seems like some posters are trying to make their case on why people shouldn't go Blu. I like having some type of HDM out there and wish people wouldn't try to downsell it now simply because HD-Dvd wasn't the "chosen" format. I didn't like the fact that the Red Sox won the World Series but I also haven't spent any time on their boards proclaiming why they shouldn't be the champs or why people shouldn't be a fan.
I am sure they will most likely be outnumbered in a topic of this nature though.
#204
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
Thanks! BTW This thread is about Warner's decision to move forward with Blu-Ray and not about upconverting players and downselling HD. If people don't want to continue to support HD because of the recent turn of events then they really shouldn't be posting in this forum.
Furthermore, if you think studios will support a niche product for a long time without the impetus of BDA support for financial incentives, marketing cash, whatever else is I believe, naive.
If and when BDA marketing "support" and "incentives" dry up, lets see how many studios stick with Blu Ray. I'm not saying they will go to HD DVD, nor do I care if they do, but they will just rely on DVDs, On Demand type purcahses or something else that we aren't using now.
Last edited by chanster; 01-07-08 at 08:04 PM.
#205
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
I understand that but it seems like some posters are trying to make their case on why people shouldn't go Blu. I like having some type of HDM out there and wish people wouldn't try to downsell it now simply because HD-Dvd wasn't the "chosen" format. I didn't like the fact that the Red Sox won the World Series but I also haven't spent any time on their boards proclaiming why they shouldn't be the champs or why people shouldn't be a fan.
#206
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
I imagine not too many are pleased that they now have to have forced region coding, unfinished specs, 50GB discs with no extras, and an entire movie format that is pretty much controlled by Sony, a movie studio, who has had many failed formats before (UMD, MiniDisc to name a few).
#207
Suspended
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
What has Toshiba done for me lately? I agree that UMD isn't the greatest format but it does serve its purpose for handheld gaming. I don't think Sony was ever trying to make UMD the next big thing but simply create a medium that would work with the PSP. What is wrong with that? And if you talk with people about Beta many will tell you that the biggest reason it failed, other than porn, was because you couldn't record on slow speed and blank tapes were expensive (20-25 bucks apiece) in those days. Region coding has been mostly standard since dvds have been around and only the astute collectors really go out of their way to get things from other regions. The average consumers, and we don't fall in this category, don't care much about region coding and probably don't put much weight on extras either. But can we honestly say that HD-Dvd gave more extras than Blu-Ray has? Hd-Dvd had some cool features but I am sure with time we will see these same types of features with advancements to boot.
I (and I'm not alone) just fear a format being run by Sony. They will always be first in line to press their movies and they will have the say so over just about everything regarding Blu-ray.
#208
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Everything you state is an opinion. Many studios were burned by UMD, including Universal. There is no reason for a 50GB disc to have 0 extras on it. No reason. 30GB discs by HD DVD were able to have many features (obviously depending on the film and the previous SD version). If Region coding wasn't important you wouldn't have people buying Oppo players.
I (and I'm not alone) just fear a format being run by Sony. They will always be first in line to press their movies and they will have the say so over just about everything regarding Blu-ray.
I (and I'm not alone) just fear a format being run by Sony. They will always be first in line to press their movies and they will have the say so over just about everything regarding Blu-ray.
#209
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why does talking about the competitive situation in the market, and what BD needs to do to succeed, and what challenges it will face, equal "not supporting HD"? That makes no sense. I support HD, which is why I want to see BDA take a strategy that will allow the tech to thrive. This"you should buy a Blu-ray player regardless of price or you hate HD" attitude is silly. The fact is HD DOES compete in the marketplace with upconverting DVD players, and now that BD's BIGGEST competition, HDDVD, appears to be on its way out, the fact that average consumers will compare BD to upconverted SDDVD IS true and relevant. It may not be to the 1%'ers GoldenEyed, GoldenEared folks on this forum who are cutting edge techies. But it is relevant to 99% of the population. And us 1%ers are not a big enough market to keep Blu-ray alive. So you should care about these things, because if Blu-ray doesn't appeal to the mass consumer, it might disappear, and we'll all lose out. This is not anti-BD talk. It is PRO-BD talk (no pun intended).
#210
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by MrDs10e
Why does talking about the competitive situation in the market, and what BD needs to do to succeed, and what challenges it will face, equal "not supporting HD"? That makes no sense. I support HD, which is why I want to see BDA take a strategy that will allow the tech to thrive. This"you should buy a Blu-ray player regardless of price or you hate HD" attitude is silly. The fact is HD DOES compete in the marketplace with upconverting DVD players, and now that BD's BIGGEST competition, HDDVD, appears to be on its way out, the fact that average consumers will compare BD to upconverted SDDVD IS relevant. It may not be to the 1%'ers on this forum who are cutting edge techies. But it is relevant to 95% of the population. And us 1%ers are not a big enough market to keep Blu-ray alive. So you should care about these things, because if Blu-ray doesn't appeal to the mass consumer, it might disappear, and we'll all lose out. This is not anti-BD talk. It is PRO-BD talk (no pun intended).
#211
DVD Talk Reviewer
I want to get into blu-ray now as I surely can prefer a lot of HD content of the SD counterparts but yes, this is all relevant because upconverted SD is good enough for plenty of people.
#212
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
I do support Blu-Ray. I would have continued supporting HD-Dvd had it been the format that studios wanted to back. I support HD media because I would like to further my collection and don't really want to go back to SD movies. I see the difference and understand that if a movie is going to be on my shelf for the next 5-20 years that I want to have the best version available at the time I made the purchase. I would like to see them lower some BD player prices for those that do not want to pay the higher prices but expecting them to do it in days is just silly.
Wish all you want, but this talk will no go away, for a very long time.
#213
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
I do support Blu-Ray. I would have continued supporting HD-Dvd had it been the format that studios wanted to back. I support HD media because I would like to further my collection and don't really want to go back to SD movies. I see the difference and understand that if a movie is going to be on my shelf for the next 5-20 years that I want to have the best version available at the time I made the purchase. I would like to see them lower some BD player prices for those that do not want to pay the higher prices but expecting them to do it in days is just silly.
#214
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
And if you talk with people about Beta many will tell you that the biggest reason it failed, other than porn, was because you couldn't record on slow speed and blank tapes were expensive (20-25 bucks apiece) in those days. .
Beta failed because Sony did not license the technology to other CEs and because VHS did, they were able to beat them on price. Beta was a superior (on paper) technology. Porn and recording length were an issue as well, but far less.
Thankfully, the BDA was smart enough to realize one company could not alone carry the burden. In fact, I wonder if there will be financial consequences for Toshiba with their sole support of HD DVD.
#215
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
You have to understand that the "war" is now BD vs. DVD. The HD DVD/BD situation was a skirmish, the wild card round to see who went to the Superbowl. The arguments wil no loger be "Why BD over HD DVD" but "why BD over DVD." Not everyone, in fact almost no one, is backing BD now, from a consumer standpoint. The battle for hearts and minds for BD has gone to the next level.
Wish all you want, but this talk will no go away, for a very long time.
Wish all you want, but this talk will no go away, for a very long time.
#216
Originally Posted by rdclark
I think it will happen. Both the studios and the hardware manufacturers have every reason to push the market to make it happen. Dual inventories are the bane of retailing.
I think we'll see the the last mainstream SD-DVD releases by the end of 2013.
I think we'll see the the last mainstream SD-DVD releases by the end of 2013.
In addition, I can't imagine streaming HD content over the nation's--not to mention the world's--unreliable bandwidth highway.
The bain of DVD manufacturers is having to replace all their equipment with totally new Blu-ray equipment, and higher Sony fees. Doesn't seem like a good proposition, unless Sony has the cash to compensate every single company that manufacturers DVDs and gives them a deal like they did WB. And I don't think they have that much cash to hand out at the front door, every single time a DVD manufacturer and movie studio comes through it. They are rather extended at the moment.
As to seeing the last SD-DVD releases by 2013, well, this is a tricky prediction. Because we don't even know if Blu-ray is going to last 5 years from now. A lot has to happen other than just "winning the war" with a competing format. Now Sony is on its own, and it has to convince the world, Blu-ray is the way.
Now, I don't mean to be pessimistic. I totally like Blu-ray. However, I don't appreciate Sony's past consumer relations (as I've stated before ad nauseum). And I will probably start buying a few Blu-ray discs anyway later this year, slowly building a Blu-ray collection. However, this doesn't mean I don't have serious doubts about Blu-ray at the moment.
Another factor which has briefly been mentioned, is what if a new HD format comes along and touts $10 discs at MSRP, and can support just as much storage as Blu-ray. Because you see, movie studios aren't in bed with Sony because they like them. If they see higher profits and a more massive consumer base, they will leave Sony. They will leave Blu-ray. And they will embrace something else. The key to any medium surviving in today's times, is it's cheapness. Look at memory cards for digital cameras. Hard drives. And so on. Keep your propriety format expensive because you want to maximize profits, and you'll end up in a corner, in a room, with the lights turned out.
HD Karma, I guess.
Last edited by DVD Polizei; 01-07-08 at 08:45 PM.
#217
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
Well then for the very least the people who post on this board should support Blu-Ray if it is going to take the support of millions to keep HD media available. Do you think that Public Enemy could have overcome a "Nation Of Millions" had Chuck D. and Flava Flav always maintained a state of discontent between them? I know that is a silly comparison but the general public would say the same thing if they were to see what we argue about on here.
There are some that say "Hallelujah! BD is the winner!" and there are some that say "Shit. BD is the winner." Who will be right? We won't know for a long time.
THIS, in a nutshell, describes BD fanboys to the best of my words. From the start of this there were some that had no doubt this would happen, even when HD DVD almost took BD out at the knees before it really launched. If reports are to be believed, this "victory" was one of a very slim margin, and could have easily gone the other way.
Keep an open mind. And please, stop telling people what to think or where they can think it.
#218
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a DVD collection with over 1000 titles. In the past year since adopting HD DVD, I have curtailed my DVD purchasing. The high prices of HDm made me be more selective. Now that HD DVD will decline, and honestly, even before this WB announcement, I began to question some of the stuff in my collection.
I think that the great era of movie collecting is on the decline. There will always be some of us around, but DVD sales are in decline. Just about every property that can be milked for a profit has been. The masses are starting to catch onto the fact that they are continuously being asked to re-purchase movies they already have. With VHS, you could sometimes justify that Disney or Star Wars re-release because the media wore out, but for many, a DVD of a movie they have is "good enough." I just don't know if even BD is enough to turn this ship around, and I doubt HD DVD would have been able to do it either.
I don't know that ANYTHING will supplant DVD for the forseable future (20 or so years). Not BD not downloads, nothing. Studios may have to be content with their new releases doing some decent money and enjoy a smaller pie than they have been accustomed to.
I think that the great era of movie collecting is on the decline. There will always be some of us around, but DVD sales are in decline. Just about every property that can be milked for a profit has been. The masses are starting to catch onto the fact that they are continuously being asked to re-purchase movies they already have. With VHS, you could sometimes justify that Disney or Star Wars re-release because the media wore out, but for many, a DVD of a movie they have is "good enough." I just don't know if even BD is enough to turn this ship around, and I doubt HD DVD would have been able to do it either.
I don't know that ANYTHING will supplant DVD for the forseable future (20 or so years). Not BD not downloads, nothing. Studios may have to be content with their new releases doing some decent money and enjoy a smaller pie than they have been accustomed to.
Last edited by Qui Gon Jim; 01-07-08 at 08:59 PM.
#219
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
I have a DVD collection with over 1000 titles. In the past year since adopting HD DVD, I have curtailed my DVD purchasing. The high prices of HDm made me be more selective. Now that HD DVD will decline, and honestly, even before this WB announcement, I began to question some of the stuff in my collection.
I think that the great era of movie collecting is on the decline. There will always be some of us around, but DVD sales are in decline. Just about every property that can be milked for a profit has been. The masses are starting to catch onto the fact that they are continuously being asked to re-purchase movies they already have. With VHS, you could sometimes justify that Disney or Star Wars re-release because the media wore out, but for many, a DVD of a movie they have is "good enough." I just don't know if even BD is enough to turn this ship around, and I doubt HD DVD would have been able to do it either.
I don't know that ANYTHING will supplant DVD for the forseable future (20 or so years). Not BD not downloads, nothing. Studios may have to be content with their new releases doing some decent money and enjoy a smaller pie than they have been accustomed to.
I think that the great era of movie collecting is on the decline. There will always be some of us around, but DVD sales are in decline. Just about every property that can be milked for a profit has been. The masses are starting to catch onto the fact that they are continuously being asked to re-purchase movies they already have. With VHS, you could sometimes justify that Disney or Star Wars re-release because the media wore out, but for many, a DVD of a movie they have is "good enough." I just don't know if even BD is enough to turn this ship around, and I doubt HD DVD would have been able to do it either.
I don't know that ANYTHING will supplant DVD for the forseable future (20 or so years). Not BD not downloads, nothing. Studios may have to be content with their new releases doing some decent money and enjoy a smaller pie than they have been accustomed to.
You very well could be right.
#221
I had a chance to view The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring Extended Edition DVD with an upconverting DVD player (a Sony model DVP-NS77H/B) and while it looks pretty good on a 1080p 50" LCD, you can still see some upconverting artifacts, especially the picture looks a tad out of focus. In contrast, a true Blu-ray disc has extremely sharp details even in the background. In short, the high-definition formats become superior when you go to 50" or larger screen sizes compared to upconverted 480p video from standard DVD's.
#222
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe DVD will be gone (i.e. not sold at major big-box retailers, not released for new movies) by 2012, replaced by some kind of high-definition PHYSICAL media, whether it is Blu-ray or something yet to come. With the prices coming down the way they are, by 2010, practically everybody is going to have an HDTV and people are going to want HD media for their HDTVs. Of course, most of us will still have SDDVD collections for many years, as most people still had record collections for many years after cassettes took over, but it will be even more painless than that since, if it is BD that takes over, the players are backward-compatible. Can't stick an LP in your cassette player.
But I think we are many years of networking infrastructure and computer advancement away from downloads being a feasible replacement to physical media. Until you can download a full-length movie in full HD in less time than it takes to drive to the store with the AVERAGE home computer and internet service, downloads will remain small potatoes.
Ultimately, I think some kind of on-demand service over cable or satellite is more likely to supplant physical media than computer-based downloading. But again, I think cable and satellite companies are many years away from the infrastructure needed to have as many movies available on demand in HD as are stocked at the local Blockbuster or BestBuy, and being able to simultaneously transmit 10,000 different movies to 1,000,000 different homes.
But I think we are many years of networking infrastructure and computer advancement away from downloads being a feasible replacement to physical media. Until you can download a full-length movie in full HD in less time than it takes to drive to the store with the AVERAGE home computer and internet service, downloads will remain small potatoes.
Ultimately, I think some kind of on-demand service over cable or satellite is more likely to supplant physical media than computer-based downloading. But again, I think cable and satellite companies are many years away from the infrastructure needed to have as many movies available on demand in HD as are stocked at the local Blockbuster or BestBuy, and being able to simultaneously transmit 10,000 different movies to 1,000,000 different homes.
#223
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RayChuang
I had a chance to view The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring Extended Edition DVD with an upconverting DVD player (a Sony model DVP-NS77H/B) and while it looks pretty good on a 1080p 50" LCD, you can still see some upconverting artifacts, especially the picture looks a tad out of focus. In contrast, a true Blu-ray disc has extremely sharp details even in the background. In short, the high-definition formats become superior when you go to 50" or larger screen sizes compared to upconverted 480p video from standard DVD's.
Secondly, I would like to know how many screens are actually 50 or larger. I'm sure there a lot, but I'm guessing the 37 -46 inches are the majority size for most HDTV buyers.
But I do agree that focus is the issue I can spot with an upconverted DVD vs. HD media...whether most people can see that, I don't know.
Last edited by chanster; 01-07-08 at 09:28 PM.
#224
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by MrDs10e
LOL that statement is so out of touch with reality. Pull ten guys off the street, and they can't tell the difference between your $1000 Denon player and a $40 player from Wal-Mart ON THE TV THEY OWN.
I definitely agree Blu-ray is not for everyone and I understand many will never need it. That is why Blu-ray will never match the sales of DVD at its peak. It has a chance to be a strong option though. Decent quality HDTVs just get cheaper and if you spend a grand on an HDTV which many people seem to be doing you will find more and more people that want HD content on it.
#225
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
I completely disagree about the streaming video future. People want hard copies. Not on their hard drives, but on a disc. And they want cool-looking cases and artwork. They want to touch and feel their collections, not just being aware they have a few thousands movies on a hard drive. This will be and has been, a geek-specific market if you will. Few people will embrace it.
In addition, I can't imagine streaming HD content over the nation's--not to mention the world's--unreliable bandwidth highway.
The bain of DVD manufacturers is having to replace all their equipment with totally new Blu-ray equipment, and higher Sony fees. Doesn't seem like a good proposition, unless Sony has the cash to compensate every single company that manufacturers DVDs and gives them a deal like they did WB. And I don't think they have that much cash to hand out at the front door, every single time a DVD manufacturer and movie studio comes through it. They are rather extended at the moment.
As to seeing the last SD-DVD releases by 2013, well, this is a tricky prediction. [snip] Another factor which has briefly been mentioned, is what if a new HD format comes along and touts $10 discs at MSRP, and can support just as much storage as Blu-ray. Because you see, movie studios aren't in bed with Sony because they like them. If they see higher profits and a more massive consumer base, they will leave Sony. They will leave Blu-ray. And they will embrace something else.