Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Star Wars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-15, 01:49 AM
  #3851  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 11,956
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt

Besides, unless they've cut a deal with FOX, Disney can't do anything with A NEW HOPE.
While this is true, I wouldn't be surprised if the two did come to terms on a SW deal. Fox lost a bit of money theatrically this summer and money's money. It was always Lucas that prevented the unaltered films from being released the way they should be, not Fox.

Disney is trying to make as much goodwill with fans as possible so pushing the unaltered films makes sense.
Old 09-20-15, 10:40 AM
  #3852  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,513
Received 149 Likes on 103 Posts
re: Star Wars

Doesn't FOX still have the distribution rights to all of them, meaning they'll release whatever Lucasfilm/Disney tell them to?
Old 09-20-15, 12:34 PM
  #3853  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,681
Received 646 Likes on 446 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by joltman
Doesn't FOX still have the distribution rights to all of them, meaning they'll release whatever Lucasfilm/Disney tell them to?
20th Century Fox is the film studio, FOX is the TV channel; they're different subsidiaries.

20th Century Fox has the distribution rights to the first 6 episodes until 2020, afterwards they'll only own the distribution rights to the first movie.

20th Century Fox doesn't have to release anything Lucasfilm/Disney asks them to. However, they'd hardly pass on the opportunity to release new content while they can. It's more likely that Disney would be reluctant to release additional content until most of the rights revert back to them.

Once 2020 rolls around, Disney would have to strike a distribution deal with Fox to release a combined boxset that includes the first Star Wars film. It seems very likely to happen though.
Old 09-20-15, 01:10 PM
  #3854  
DVD Talk Hero
 
PhantomStranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Phantom Zone
Posts: 27,422
Received 791 Likes on 665 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
I bet no one noticed I was gone.
You disappeared during the summer months, when many people temporarily fall off from the forum for other things.
Old 09-20-15, 01:27 PM
  #3855  
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: spiritually, Minnesota
Posts: 36,876
Received 674 Likes on 450 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
I bet no one noticed I was gone.
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
You disappeared during the summer months, when many people temporarily fall off from the forum for other things.
I once left for about six months with nary a peep.

I think this forum is big and varied enough that no one would be missed, except maybe Chad come mid-September.
Old 09-20-15, 06:17 PM
  #3856  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
rocket1312's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,153
Likes: 0
Received 953 Likes on 674 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
Well, there's still the color-timing, the garbage mattes, the sound mix, and lots of other things they could potentially fuck up.

I bet no one noticed I was gone.
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/12589062-post21.html
Old 09-20-15, 06:29 PM
  #3857  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,712
Received 1,130 Likes on 890 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
Once 2020 rolls around, Disney would have to strike a distribution deal with Fox to release a combined boxset that includes the first Star Wars film. It seems very likely to happen though.
I wonder about this in all honesty. It seems to make sense that Fox would work with Disney on Star Wars releases going forward because let's be honest most people who are interested in buying the film probably want at least the Original Trilogy which Fox won't be able to provide. Fox would seemingly be at a disadvantage just having the first film to release on its own (although I'm sure it'd still sell some copies) but they also seem pretty against the idea of playing nice with Disney as far as the Marvel properties they own. Plus Disney isn't helping matters either really by sabotaging the X-Men and Fantastic Four so I'm really curious if they'll work something out or not.
Old 09-20-15, 06:57 PM
  #3858  
DVD Talk Hero
 
PhantomStranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Phantom Zone
Posts: 27,422
Received 791 Likes on 665 Posts
re: Star Wars

Both sides would be leaving money on the table if the original Star Wars Trilogy gets split up to any degree. I see some posturing but ultimately they will agree to a truce.
Old 09-20-15, 07:52 PM
  #3859  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,681
Received 646 Likes on 446 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Mike86
Fox would seemingly be at a disadvantage just having the first film to release on its own (although I'm sure it'd still sell some copies) but they also seem pretty against the idea of playing nice with Disney as far as the Marvel properties they own. Plus Disney isn't helping matters either really by sabotaging the X-Men and Fantastic Four so I'm really curious if they'll work something out or not.
The Star Wars and Marvel properties are two entirely different scenarios. With Star Wars, Fox only has distribution rights, period. They can't make more Star Wars films, they can only distribute the ones they already have, and they soon will only have the rights to one.

With X-Men and Fantastic Four, Fox owns the movie rights outright, they can continue making their own films without Disney, so they are. There's no reason to strike a partnership and share with Disney if they can make a successful film franchise on their own, which they have with X-Men. Keep in mind Sony only partnered with Disney with Spiderman after their latest solo effort underperformed.

Also, I honestly don't know what you mean by "Disney sabotaging the X-Men and Fantastic Four." I'm not aware of Disney doing anything to directly harm those film franchises.
Old 09-20-15, 08:31 PM
  #3860  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,712
Received 1,130 Likes on 890 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
The Star Wars and Marvel properties are two entirely different scenarios. With Star Wars, Fox only has distribution rights, period. They can't make more Star Wars films, they can only distribute the ones they already have, and they soon will only have the rights to one.
Either way though it's no secret that there's no love lost between the two companies. I could see Fox holding out on letting Disney use the original film to spite them. I'm sure it pisses Fox off to no end to lose one of the biggest franchises they previously held the rights to.

Also, I honestly don't know what you mean by "Disney sabotaging the X-Men and Fantastic Four." I'm not aware of Disney doing anything to directly harm those film franchises.
Marvel cancelled the Fantastic Four comic and it was rumored to be partly because of Disney not wanting Fox to get promotion for their film off the comic series. Plus there's rumors that Marvel is trying to replace the X-Men with the Inhumans.
Old 09-20-15, 09:06 PM
  #3861  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,681
Received 646 Likes on 446 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Mike86
Either way though it's no secret that there's no love lost between the two companies. I could see Fox holding out on letting Disney use the original film to spite them. I'm sure it pisses Fox off to no end to lose one of the biggest franchises they previously held the rights to.
These are film companies, not 12 year olds. Even if someone at Fox wanted to be so petty, by the time 2020 rolls around there will have been so much turnover it'll be effectively a different company, one that puts profit above all else.

Originally Posted by Mike86
Marvel cancelled the Fantastic Four comic...
I'm not sure that really sabotaged the movie though, and the head of Fox didn't think so either:
http://comicbook.com/2014/11/15/fant...e-movie-accor/

Originally Posted by Mike86
Plus there's rumors that Marvel is trying to replace the X-Men with the Inhumans.
Do you mean in the comics or in the MCU? Because in the movies/TV shows they're definitely angling for Inhumans to be their substitutes for mutants.

But even if there is actual bad blood between Disney and Fox over Marvel properties, that won't necessarily translate over to the Star Wars properties. Companies can often seem schizophrenic, fighting over one thing while at the same time working together on something else. See things like Apple suing Samsung over their smartphones while still getting all the LCD screens for the iDevices from Samsung. So even a beef over Marvel doesn't mean a Star Wars deal wouldn't happen.
Old 09-20-15, 10:33 PM
  #3862  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Josh-da-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Bible Belt
Posts: 43,820
Received 2,694 Likes on 1,858 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
These are film companies, not 12 year olds. Even if someone at Fox wanted to be so petty, by the time 2020 rolls around there will have been so much turnover it'll be effectively a different company, one that puts profit above all else.


I'm not sure that really sabotaged the movie though, and the head of Fox didn't think so either:
http://comicbook.com/2014/11/15/fant...e-movie-accor/
Canceling the Fantastic Four comic was an act of pettiness on Marvel's part (or, more specifically, one person in particular). They've also been downplaying the FF and X-Men in non-movie related merchandise.


Do you mean in the comics or in the MCU? Because in the movies/TV shows they're definitely angling for Inhumans to be their substitutes for mutants.

But even if there is actual bad blood between Disney and Fox over Marvel properties, that won't necessarily translate over to the Star Wars properties. Companies can often seem schizophrenic, fighting over one thing while at the same time working together on something else. See things like Apple suing Samsung over their smartphones while still getting all the LCD screens for the iDevices from Samsung. So even a beef over Marvel doesn't mean a Star Wars deal wouldn't happen.
Yeah, they're definitely playing up The Inhumans, in both TV/movies and the comics. While Marvel won't cancel the X-family books, it is rumored that they do have something 'big' in mind for them... Namely
Spoiler:
sending most or all mutants to another planet because the Terrigen mists that trigger Inhumans are lethal to mutants. Though playing up the Inhumans at the expense of the X-Men is probably the film/tv division tail wagging the comic dog, much like how they replaced the comic book Nick Fury with one that resembles Sam Jackson.


At any rate, I wouldn't expect any Marvel-Fox conflicts to spill over into Star Wars, as much of the acrimony between the Marvel publishing division seems to come from one person who rules over Marvel, but probably has minimal influence over Lucasfilm.
Old 09-21-15, 12:17 AM
  #3863  
DVD Talk Hero
 
PhantomStranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Phantom Zone
Posts: 27,422
Received 791 Likes on 665 Posts
re: Star Wars

It's pretty clear a corporate agenda at Disney has been developed to de-emphasize Marvel properties they don't have complete control over (Fantastic Four, X-Men, the Hulk) for characters they own lock, stock and barrel on film/television. Marvel/Disney have basically abandoned merchandising those characters for ones they don't share any profits with.
Old 09-21-15, 07:26 AM
  #3864  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,681
Received 646 Likes on 446 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
...much like how they replaced the comic book Nick Fury with one that resembles Sam Jackson.
To be fair, Marvel made The Ultimates Nick Fury look like Sam Jackson well before he was ever cast for the role in the films. Even if Marvel had never made any movies, they may have eventually gone down the "Nick Fury Jr." route anyway.

Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
It's pretty clear a corporate agenda at Disney has been developed to de-emphasize Marvel properties they don't have complete control over (Fantastic Four, X-Men, the Hulk) for characters they own lock, stock and barrel on film/television. Marvel/Disney have basically abandoned merchandising those characters for ones they don't share any profits with.
Yeah, but that just makes business sense. What I don't agree with is the concept is their de-emphasis on certain property translates to "Disney sabotages Fox's film franchises" (I doubt the FF comic cancelation had any impact on the latest film's box office), nor that any theoretical animosity between Fox and Disney over Marvel would preclude a deal for Star Wars.
Old 09-21-15, 09:55 AM
  #3865  
DVD Talk Legend
 
milo bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 18,271
Received 1,396 Likes on 1,024 Posts
re: Star Wars

While I'm usually the first to accept a claim of corporate malfeasance, I'm fairly sure Star Wars will be handled differently. No matter how popular comic book movies have become with the general populace, the vast majority of them are still not going to pick up a comic book. There will be people who were already on the edge of getting into comics, but most people simply won't.

Star Wars is different, it crosses over into all walks of life. Disney has massive pockets, and as others have noted, Fox may be looking for cash.

*Something* will happen. We can't guess at all the details, but people who keep throwing out that Fox distribution deal like it's some kind of immovable stone blocking the gates of heaven really need to take a reality check.
Old 09-21-15, 01:32 PM
  #3866  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18,354
Received 324 Likes on 242 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
These are film companies, not 12 year olds.
Honestly, you'd have better luck making a deal between 12 year olds.
Old 09-21-15, 01:55 PM
  #3867  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 11,956
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by milo bloom
While I'm usually the first to accept a claim of corporate malfeasance, I'm fairly sure Star Wars will be handled differently. No matter how popular comic book movies have become with the general populace, the vast majority of them are still not going to pick up a comic book. There will be people who were already on the edge of getting into comics, but most people simply won't.

Star Wars is different, it crosses over into all walks of life. Disney has massive pockets, and as others have noted, Fox may be looking for cash.

*Something* will happen. We can't guess at all the details, but people who keep throwing out that Fox distribution deal like it's some kind of immovable stone blocking the gates of heaven really need to take a reality check.
Batman is big too, which is why the old TV show had the rights eventually figured out. If Lucas does not have the power to block the originals from being remastered and released I suspect it will eventually happen.
Old 09-21-15, 02:02 PM
  #3868  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
davidh777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Home of 2013 NFL champion Seahawks
Posts: 52,538
Received 994 Likes on 824 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Trevor
I once left for about six months with nary a peep.

I think this forum is big and varied enough that no one would be missed, except maybe Chad come mid-September.
I think I mentioned something about your being back, if it's the time I was thinking of. Pretty sure there are a lot of people I'd notice, like when they don't post in threads where I'd expect them to.

Originally Posted by rocket1312
Thanks! I thought of that post the other day when han reappeared but couldn't remember which thread it was (my first thought was mojo so I'm glad I hadn't gotten around to looking for it).
Old 09-24-15, 10:21 PM
  #3869  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Josh Z
As an analog format, Laserdisc picture quality varied widely based on the quality of the player used. There could be a significant difference in what you saw between an entry-level and a high-end model. Much more than anything you'd ever see between two different DVD players. Further, those screencap comparisons are highly misleading. The disc used was in CLV format, which did not offer true still frame capability. When paused, you got a half-resolution interlaced field, not the whole frame. Also, the "1995 PAL Laserdisc" was an NTSC-to-PAL conversion, which was not done very well back in the day and typically resulted in a worse image despite the higher resolution of the PAL format. Laserdisc did not have any significant market penetration in Europe, and most PAL LDs were inferior to their NTSC counterparts. Screencapping Laserdiscs is highly problematic under even the best circumstances. The example posted is not the best circumstance. I'm not saying this to suggest that the Star Wars Laserdisc was great quality. Just that, in this specific instance, any difference between the LD and the DVD is negligible.

The Definitive Collection box set had all the discs in CAV format, a half-hour of video per side. The 1995 re-releases were CLV format, an hour per side. The 1995 discs also had no bonus features. Other than that, they used the same video transfers.
What really burned me about the whole thing was the "bonus material" BS. I may not have liked Lucas' stance that "the originals are dead," but prior to the 2008 releases, he had at least stuck by his guns for the past decade. I hated his view, but he stood by it. I'd rather be continued to than do a half-assed laserdisc port, it was utter crock. I was so elated to hear that they were coming out and then crushed to heard about what they'd be. The "bonus material" crap was insulting. If you can't do something correctly, then don't bother doing it at all. It was the ultimate act of hypocrisy.

Originally Posted by Josh Z
No, it's not, because neither one of them knew they were related at the time.
Doesn't make it any less uncomfortable when the viewer knows .

Last edited by hanshotfirst1138; 11-20-15 at 08:19 PM.
Old 09-24-15, 11:35 PM
  #3870  
DVD Talk Hero
 
slop101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 43,874
Received 443 Likes on 310 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
Doesn't make it any less uncomfortable when the viewer knows .
When I saw the Empire re-release in a big crowded theater, during that scene, the entire crowd went "Ewwww!" It was hilarious.
Old 09-25-15, 10:11 AM
  #3871  
DVD Talk Legend
 
milo bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 18,271
Received 1,396 Likes on 1,024 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
What really burned me about the whole thing was the "bonus material" BS. I may not have liked Lucas' stance that "the originals are dead," but prior to the 2008 releases, he had at least stuck by his guns for the past decade. I hated his view, but he stood by it. I'd rather be continued to than do a half-assed laserdisc port, it was utter crock. I was so elated to hear that they were coming out and then crushed to heard about what they'd be. The "bonus material" crap was insulting. If you can't do something correctly, then don't bother doing it at all. It was the ultimate act of hypocrisy.

Thank you for putting it into words. All these years it's just sat inside me as a ball of smoldering rage. These weren't some quirky little side projects, this is the stuff that f*cking made him!. To treat them that way has always made me both mad that they're not in a decent format for viewing but also sad that somebody could let a project of theirs be presented in such a cheap way.
Old 09-25-15, 07:40 PM
  #3872  
DVD Talk Reviewer & TOAT Winner
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 10,428
Received 330 Likes on 249 Posts
re: Star Wars

I'd bet anything that George Lucas has Asperger's (and I say this as someone with it!)
Old 09-25-15, 07:54 PM
  #3873  
DVD Talk Legend
 
The Valeyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,800
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
re: Star Wars

Wonder if Lucas has a stack of old Star Wars CEDs in his living room?
Old 09-25-15, 10:04 PM
  #3874  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
I'd bet anything that George Lucas has Asperger's (and I say this as someone with it!)
I have it too. Not that any of you could tell .
Old 09-26-15, 12:36 AM
  #3875  
DVD Talk Reviewer & TOAT Winner
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 10,428
Received 330 Likes on 249 Posts
re: Star Wars

Wonder if Lucas has a stack of old Star Wars CEDs in his living room?
Those don't exist anymore!


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.