The Dark Knight (Batman Begins 2) Discussion - Part 3
#26
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by Doc MacGyver
Agreed on the Tumbler, to a T. When the first publicity stills of it for Begins showed up, my response was definitely in the Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot. territory.
Seeing that beast in action, though, it's become my favorite Batmobile.
I also LOVED (as I said in one of the 30 Dark Knight threads) that the Bat-Pod ejected from it. It explains the heretofor stupid name (which I thought was just an attempt to NOT call it the Bat-cycle) AND it avoids the appearance of Batman having toys for toys' sake, or simply a marketing gimmick. I've seen the film three times and each time there was a tangeable "whoa" reaction from the audience. And the fact that the entire chase is scoreless prior to it's appearance and then kicks in full-tilt when that sucker takes off = beautiful.
As for the next one (should Nolan & co. continue), my current most anticipated possibility is the new Batcave. I originally thought the movie would end with Bruce in it, staring at a bank of screens or the like... boy was I (thankfully) wrong. The current ending is perfection.
-Doc
Seeing that beast in action, though, it's become my favorite Batmobile.
I also LOVED (as I said in one of the 30 Dark Knight threads) that the Bat-Pod ejected from it. It explains the heretofor stupid name (which I thought was just an attempt to NOT call it the Bat-cycle) AND it avoids the appearance of Batman having toys for toys' sake, or simply a marketing gimmick. I've seen the film three times and each time there was a tangeable "whoa" reaction from the audience. And the fact that the entire chase is scoreless prior to it's appearance and then kicks in full-tilt when that sucker takes off = beautiful.
As for the next one (should Nolan & co. continue), my current most anticipated possibility is the new Batcave. I originally thought the movie would end with Bruce in it, staring at a bank of screens or the like... boy was I (thankfully) wrong. The current ending is perfection.
-Doc
#27
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it was about halfway through the movie when I realized we hadn't seen Wayne Manor or the Batcave. While it might have been nice to see at least a few shots of the reconstruction, it wouldn't have worked at all with the idea of Bruce Wayne/Batman being in the thick of the insanity. When Dent says to him something about Wayne Manor not being within the city limits, I think that's a subtle (or not) clue as to why there is no Wayne Manor or Batcave in this one: for Batman to truly be troubled by what's going on he has to live within the chaos.
#28
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,172
Received 1,763 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
Originally Posted by fumanstan
Listen, i'm a comic book purist and the Batmobile never looks like a tank in the regular comics outside of one offs like Dark Knight Returns so clearly the tumbler fails in all regards!
#29
DVD Talk Legend
They could always go use the second tumbler that has not been seen, but talked about during Begins by Fox.
I have a feeling the future of the batmobile will revolve around the Mr. Reese/identity plot. I was both happy and upset when the Tumbler was brought up by Reese in TDK. After Begins everyone was pointing to how easy it would be for people to identify the Tumbler as a Wayne project and there you go.
I have a feeling the future of the batmobile will revolve around the Mr. Reese/identity plot. I was both happy and upset when the Tumbler was brought up by Reese in TDK. After Begins everyone was pointing to how easy it would be for people to identify the Tumbler as a Wayne project and there you go.
#30
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fumanstan
Listen, i'm a comic book purist and the Batmobile never looks like a tank in the regular comics outside of one offs like Dark Knight Returns so clearly the tumbler fails in all regards!
HA! It's a good thing most of my office has now gone home for the day as I very audibly snorted a laugh at that. Touche, Sir.
And you're right, with the exception of the UAV in DKR, this is a very different Batmobile.
...I'm going to share a secret I've never told anyone...
...I've never actually liked any of the comic book Batmobiles nor the consistancy with which they're used...
So in this regard, I feel like the movie even on-up'ed the books. (Ducks and flees from the hypocrite-bombs sure to be flung my way)
-Doc
#31
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,172
Received 1,763 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
Originally Posted by DthRdrX
They could always go use the second tumbler that has not been seen, but talked about during Begins by Fox.
I have a feeling the future of the batmobile will revolve around the Mr. Reese/identity plot. I was both happy and upset when the Tumbler was brought up by Reese in TDK. After Begins everyone was pointing to how easy it would be for people to identify the Tumbler as a Wayne project and there you go.
I have a feeling the future of the batmobile will revolve around the Mr. Reese/identity plot. I was both happy and upset when the Tumbler was brought up by Reese in TDK. After Begins everyone was pointing to how easy it would be for people to identify the Tumbler as a Wayne project and there you go.
Yeah but, it's possible that after Bruce saved Reese and after Reese acknowledged what Bruce did for him, he'll no longer be a problem.
But who knows....
Hey, maybe they'll incorporate him into the next film? After all, in this realistic Nolan-universe the idea that Fox and Fox alone can know anything about Batman/Bruce at Wayne industries is a bit of a stretch.
Like I said, who knows...
Last edited by Giantrobo; 07-23-08 at 04:37 PM.
#32
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,172
Received 1,763 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
Originally Posted by Doc MacGyver
...I'm going to share a secret I've never told anyone...
...I've never actually liked any of the comic book Batmobiles nor the consistancy with which they're used...
So in this regard, I feel like the movie even on-up'ed the books. (Ducks and flees from the hypocrite-bombs sure to be flung my way)
-Doc
That said, correct me if I'm wrong but I think Nolan's 2 films are the only ones to NOT make drastic aesthetic changes between films. Frankly I appreciate this. I don't mind the technical addition of the batpod.
Last edited by Giantrobo; 07-23-08 at 04:38 PM.
#33
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
Plus, in EVERY Bat film they've drastically changed the look of the Batmobile between the films just like in the comics, depending on who's drawing. There's no one look for the batmobile.
That said, correct me if I'm wrong but I think Nolan's 2 films are the only ones to NOT make drastic aesthetic changes between films. Frankly I appreciate this. I don't mind the technical addition of the batpod.
That said, correct me if I'm wrong but I think Nolan's 2 films are the only ones to NOT make drastic aesthetic changes between films. Frankly I appreciate this. I don't mind the technical addition of the batpod.
Well the Batmobile in Batman Returns was the same from '89 (the shields look different), but then to get through an alley the sides blew apart and it got skinny (sort of similar in a way to the Bat-pod, only lame).
-Doc
#34
DVD Talk Godfather
Weren't Burton's the same?
Still, while they've always been different in the comics generally they have the same type of look, being long and sleek, sitting 2 people, with generally just variations in the fins or hood.
Still, while they've always been different in the comics generally they have the same type of look, being long and sleek, sitting 2 people, with generally just variations in the fins or hood.
#36
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by CKMorpheus
So since Bruce destroyed the Sonar machine for Fox, will Morgan Freeman return for a third? Or will Bruce have to hire someone else to make his "neat toys."
The voice-over speech about faith, along with Fox's smirk as the sonar machine self-destructs is a pretty clear sign he will return. Unless of course Morgan Freeman pulls a Katie Holmes.
#38
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: United States of HELL YEAH!!!
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JTH182
The voice-over speech about faith, along with Fox's smirk as the sonar machine self-destructs is a pretty clear sign he will return. Unless of course Morgan Freeman pulls a Katie Holmes.
#40
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doc MacGyver
Well the Batmobile in Batman Returns was the same from '89 (the shields look different), but then to get through an alley the sides blew apart and it got skinny (sort of similar in a way to the Bat-pod, only lame).
-Doc
-Doc
#41
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by Doc MacGyver
Well the Batmobile in Batman Returns was the same from '89 (the shields look different), but then to get through an alley the sides blew apart and it got skinny (sort of similar in a way to the Bat-pod, only lame).
my preference for the third movie wouldn't be as sporty as Burton's. i think i'd just like it to be more B-2 Stealth Bomber than F-117 Stealth Fighter in appearance.
#43
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NiCK Crush
I cant get over how enjoyable the Bat-Pod was. Really spectacular, especially because i didnt see its birth coming right away.
Spoiler:
Seriously. Both times I groaned when I first saw the vehicles months before release. And BOTH times I left the theater enjoying the every-loving shit out of them. Nolan's really managed to do something special with the Bat-fleet. At this point, I'm just going to sit back and trust him (should he do a third).
-Doc
#44
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Muncie, IN [Member formerly known as abrg923]
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by reubs82
I'll agree with folks about the Tumbler. At first I thought, "WTF is that, and why is that the concept for the Batmobile?" After seeing it action, though, it makes a helluva lot more sense than any of the other live-action Batmobiles, and that's including the sporty convertible found in the 60s version.
Staying on the bat-transportation theme, I don't think I expected the batpod to be an emergency-ejection accessory, and I really liked how they stuck with that for the rest of the film instead of having Bats find another Tumbler tucked away at Wayne Ent.
Staying on the bat-transportation theme, I don't think I expected the batpod to be an emergency-ejection accessory, and I really liked how they stuck with that for the rest of the film instead of having Bats find another Tumbler tucked away at Wayne Ent.
#47
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Chip718
Has anyone checked this out at the Cradle of Aviation IMAX in Long Island? The theater looks kinda small and was wondering if I should travel to a IMAX in the city or is the one in LI good enough. TIA for any info
My only issue with the screen is that it is a domed screen. You really wanna sit towards the back to get a good feel of the movie. We saw I am Legend there just to catch the first 6 minutes of TDK back in Decmebr and we had to sit in the second row which was just cruel.
It is a rather small theater as well, although I've never been to another Imax theater so I cannot compare. I would like to visit one with a regular screen instead of a dome to compare.
The sound was incredible as well.
#50
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by CKMorpheus
No need for that kinda attitude. Care to enlighten us?
Christian has expressed enthusiasm for doing a third "Batman" with you. How about it?
All I can say is that, when we finished the first film, I didn't have any intention of doing a second one. And this time, I really tried to put everything that I ever wanted to see in the Batman story into this film. I wanted to make a great sequel, because there are very few great sequels. Really, I'm thinking only "Godfather: Part II" and "The Empire Strikes Back."
All I can say is that, when we finished the first film, I didn't have any intention of doing a second one. And this time, I really tried to put everything that I ever wanted to see in the Batman story into this film. I wanted to make a great sequel, because there are very few great sequels. Really, I'm thinking only "Godfather: Part II" and "The Empire Strikes Back."