FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
#27
DVD Talk Legend
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
You're right, and it's not censored in the BR release, and presumably not the DVD release.
#28
DVD Talk God
#29
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
This move would probably only lead to more boring crime procedural shows, JackAss inspired reality shows, and a edgier Family Guy (If that is possible).
The main problem with network television is they don't want to take chances on shows that fall out of the norm. Take ABC for instance, they are only willing to greenlight a show like S.H.E.L.D because in the ABC executive minds they are imagining this generic spy show with pretty face 20 something actors and a total minimization of the superhero stuff.
Network exec's think they are being edgy when they greenlight a recycled show from the 70's and 80's.
#30
DVD Talk Hero
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
The main problem with network television is they don't want to take chances on shows that fall out of the norm. Take ABC for instance, they are only willing to greenlight a show like S.H.E.L.D because in the ABC executive minds they are imagining this generic spy show with pretty face 20 something actors and a total minimization of the superhero stuff.
#31
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
One Million Moms is just the name of the organization, not the number of actual members it has. As Ellen Degeneres said, "They're rounding [up] to the nearest million."
#32
DVD Talk Hero
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
#33
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
The thing is shows on AMC and FX don't really go too much further than broadcast networks. I can only imagine what show like The Shield, Nip/ Tuck, Breaking Bad and Mad Men would be like on HBO, Showtime, Starz or Cinemax.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nantucket, MA
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
How much nudity did you see on The Wire? There was no need for it to drive the story. Swearing and plenty of N Bombs though....and it fit. Remember the classic scene with Mcnulty and Bunk where they said nothing but "fuck". Hilarous and real.
Shows like Sons of Anarchy or The Shield suffer only slightly by the absense of the occasional fuck or the harsher racial slurs. It's how real people talk, we use alot of fucking obscenities.
Obscenities are expressive parts of the english language and should be allowed at any time, just not in excess. I think seasons 4 and 5 of Damages used the ability to swear perfectly when they jumped channels. Just enough for it to be poignant. Anyone remember when they showed Trailer Park Boys on BBC America?
I was blown away by the amount of blood and graphic violence in the Hannibal pilot. It was superb but very suprising they got away with that. Seemed like someone at NBC had been watching alot of UK crime dramas recently.
Just once I would love to watch Kitchen Nightmares, Hotel Hell or Hell's Kitchen in it's uncensored glory on network tv. Canada can do it. Australia can do it. UK does it. Why cant we?
Justified kills AT MINIMUM 1 person every episode. I think it's possibly the most violent thing on television....but also the best thing on tv!
Last edited by skacore; 04-11-13 at 12:20 PM.
#35
DVD Talk God
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 130,212
Received 602 Likes
on
486 Posts
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
I'll never understand why 'fuck' is supposedly off limits on basic cablenets but 'shit' is okay. It's just all so arbitrary. Reminds me of the P&T Bullshit episode on Profanity.
#36
DVD Talk Hero
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
I'm starting a website that will simply get people to fill out the same templates as OneMillionMoms, properly reworded. Those twats are annoying as fuck.
Last edited by RichC2; 04-11-13 at 02:04 PM.
#39
DVD Talk Hero
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
Anyways, I'm perfectly fine with relaxing the rules. Maybe we'll get more ballsy big budget shows (like AMC does). My TV watching is pretty chill right now. I watch my late night shows, Walking Dead, NBC comedies, and a few others. Just started watching Hannibal. Things could go bad if I have too much awesome TV to watch.
And if not, I'm perfectly fine with my family-friendly network shows mixed with some meaner cable shows.
#40
DVD Talk Reviewer & TOAT Winner
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
As far as advertisers go, there are people who will boycott them for sponsoring anything that offends them. I wound up on the Parents' Television Council mailing list (don't remember exactly how, but I usually read their messages since they're entertaining) and they usually spotlight something on TV or cable that offended them, and urge people to harass the companies that sponsored it until they stop advertising on it. It's stuff like this more than FCC rules that's made most TV content as repressed as it is.
#42
DVD Talk Reviewer & TOAT Winner
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
"Let's save network television"? Well, loosening up its mostly self-imposed content restrictions could help, but to really save it they will have to get rid of the on-screen crap during shows, and shorten commercial time back to a reasonable amount (10 minutes per hour.) If they can't do that, I won't watch no matter how good the show is.
#43
DVD Talk Hero
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
"Let's save network television"? Well, loosening up its mostly self-imposed content restrictions could help, but to really save it they will have to get rid of the on-screen crap during shows, and shorten commercial time back to a reasonable amount (10 minutes per hour.) If they can't do that, I won't watch no matter how good the show is.
#44
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
#45
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
Ortiz of Boston Red Sox tosses F-word, FCC doesn't complain
By Mark Morgenstein, CNN
updated 5:45 PM EDT, Sun April 21, 2013
(CNN) -- A Red Sox star used blue language, but he won't be fined any green for his emotional reaction the day after police captured marathon bombing suspect Dzhokar Tsarnaev.
To the contrary, longtime Boston icon David "Big Papi" Ortiz's use of profanity has been Federal Communications Commission-approved.
In a ceremony before the Red Sox took on the Kansas City Royals at a packed Fenway Park on Saturday, Ortiz threw out the F-word while delivering an inspirational message over the baseball stadium's loudspeakers.
"This jersey, that we wear today, it doesn't say 'Red Sox.' It says 'Boston,' " Ortiz said, standing on the infield as the crowd cheered officers who were on the field.
"We want to thank you Mayor Menino, Governor Patrick, the whole police department, for the great job that they did this past week. This is our f***ing city. And nobody's going to dictate our freedom. Stay strong," he said.
While the FCC has pursued others for broadcast profanity -- most notably, FOX Television Stations for expletives dropped during live awards shows in 2002 and 2003 -- FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski gave Ortiz a free pass Saturday.
He tweeted: "David Ortiz spoke from the heart at today's Red Sox game. I stand with Big Papi and the people of Boston - Julius."
The Red Sox had canceled Friday night's game with the Royals, as the massive manhunt for Tsarnaev shut down much of the Boston metropolitan area.
By Mark Morgenstein, CNN
updated 5:45 PM EDT, Sun April 21, 2013
(CNN) -- A Red Sox star used blue language, but he won't be fined any green for his emotional reaction the day after police captured marathon bombing suspect Dzhokar Tsarnaev.
To the contrary, longtime Boston icon David "Big Papi" Ortiz's use of profanity has been Federal Communications Commission-approved.
In a ceremony before the Red Sox took on the Kansas City Royals at a packed Fenway Park on Saturday, Ortiz threw out the F-word while delivering an inspirational message over the baseball stadium's loudspeakers.
"This jersey, that we wear today, it doesn't say 'Red Sox.' It says 'Boston,' " Ortiz said, standing on the infield as the crowd cheered officers who were on the field.
"We want to thank you Mayor Menino, Governor Patrick, the whole police department, for the great job that they did this past week. This is our f***ing city. And nobody's going to dictate our freedom. Stay strong," he said.
While the FCC has pursued others for broadcast profanity -- most notably, FOX Television Stations for expletives dropped during live awards shows in 2002 and 2003 -- FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski gave Ortiz a free pass Saturday.
He tweeted: "David Ortiz spoke from the heart at today's Red Sox game. I stand with Big Papi and the people of Boston - Julius."
The Red Sox had canceled Friday night's game with the Royals, as the massive manhunt for Tsarnaev shut down much of the Boston metropolitan area.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1NttSTenyEk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
A sign of change or just cutting the guy some slack given this past week?
#46
DVD Talk Reviewer & TOAT Winner
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
Brand New TV News Anchor's First Words On-Air: "Fuckin' Shit!"
http://deadspin.com/brand-new-tv-new...466?autoplay=1
http://deadspin.com/brand-new-tv-new...466?autoplay=1
#47
DVD Talk Godfather
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,172
Received 1,763 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
Re: FCC Asking If They Should Make Changes To Their Policies
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/21/us/mas...html?hpt=hp_t3
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1NttSTenyEk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
A sign of change or just cutting the guy some slack given this past week?
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1NttSTenyEk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
A sign of change or just cutting the guy some slack given this past week?