Star Wars
#1301
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
re: Star Wars
Gene Roddenberry once quipped, "Sure, I created Star Trek. But that doesn't mean I sleep in Captain Kirk pajamas." Ian Fleming frequently downplayed James Bond's literary value, insisting he never intended to write anything approaching high art. My point is that when you hear a creator distance himself from his work, it's because he wants to be taken seriously. When you hear a creator champion his work, it's because he wants his work to be taken seriously. Lucas doesn't appear to take Star Wars seriously. Maybe there's something to that, because there are a lot of people who have taken it a little too seriously. I mean, how do you go out in public and strut after your glorified toy commercials are touted as "The Holy Trilogy" and still take yourself seriously?
#1302
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hollywood Ca
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
I get the sense that even though he's made a ton of money, is often cited as an influence within the industry and owns the most important company in the business (ILM, the SFX standard), there's a sort of embarrassed inferiority complex within Lucas about having cut his swath with these silly little space fairy tales. He always talked about doing artistic indie movies, but hasn't done them for reasons that have never been articulated. I think he's just afraid of coming off as nerdy as fans. Not because he's afraid they won't still worship him, but because I think he's self-conscious about how his peers see him.
Gene Roddenberry once quipped, "Sure, I created Star Trek. But that doesn't mean I sleep in Captain Kirk pajamas." Ian Fleming frequently downplayed James Bond's literary value, insisting he never intended to write anything approaching high art. My point is that when you hear a creator distance himself from his work, it's because he wants to be taken seriously. When you hear a creator champion his work, it's because he wants his work to be taken seriously. Lucas doesn't appear to take Star Wars seriously. Maybe there's something to that, because there are a lot of people who have taken it a little too seriously. I mean, how do you go out in public and strut after your glorified toy commercials are touted as "The Holy Trilogy" and still take yourself seriously?
Gene Roddenberry once quipped, "Sure, I created Star Trek. But that doesn't mean I sleep in Captain Kirk pajamas." Ian Fleming frequently downplayed James Bond's literary value, insisting he never intended to write anything approaching high art. My point is that when you hear a creator distance himself from his work, it's because he wants to be taken seriously. When you hear a creator champion his work, it's because he wants his work to be taken seriously. Lucas doesn't appear to take Star Wars seriously. Maybe there's something to that, because there are a lot of people who have taken it a little too seriously. I mean, how do you go out in public and strut after your glorified toy commercials are touted as "The Holy Trilogy" and still take yourself seriously?
#1303
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hollywood Ca
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
It's fine that you enjoy the special editions and believe them to be superior to the original versions.
Would you enjoy them less if the unaltered versions were available as well?
The issue isn't that the films have been changed, the issue is that there is an agenda on Lucasfilm's part to suppress the original versions of these films.
Whether you or George Lucas like it or not, the Star Wars movies are historically significant films. The 1977 version of "Star Wars" changed many things about the movie industry. It had revolutionary special effects and art direction. It was unlike anything that had been seen before.
And it is very sad that this version of the movie has been suppressed by its creator and replaced with a version that changes many of the things that made this a historically significant movie in the first place.
Would you enjoy them less if the unaltered versions were available as well?
The issue isn't that the films have been changed, the issue is that there is an agenda on Lucasfilm's part to suppress the original versions of these films.
Whether you or George Lucas like it or not, the Star Wars movies are historically significant films. The 1977 version of "Star Wars" changed many things about the movie industry. It had revolutionary special effects and art direction. It was unlike anything that had been seen before.
And it is very sad that this version of the movie has been suppressed by its creator and replaced with a version that changes many of the things that made this a historically significant movie in the first place.
I also dont need to be lectured to about the historical signifigance of the film either. I am very well aware of its place in film history.
#1304
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
There's also the argument about original vs. current "intent" for the films. Lucas likes to claim that the SEs are how he always intended the films to be, but this is simply not true. Many of the more grievous changes were ones that could've easily been done back during the original editing (or shooting), while some he's even waffled on. Then there's the changes that are clearly just to make the original trilogy fit with the prequels better.
Finally, there's the point that, as far as directorial intent goes, Lucas was only the director of the first film. For the sequels, Lucas as producer is overriding the original directors' intent for those films, something he himself argued against in front of congress, 23 years ago.
http://savestarwars.com/lucasspeecha...aledition.html
Originally Posted by George Lucas
A copyright is held in trust by its owner until it ultimately reverts to public domain. American works of art belong to the American public; they are part of our cultural history...
People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an exercise of power are barbarians.. it will soon be possible to create a new "original" negative with whatever changes or alterations the copyright holder of the moment desires. The copyright holders, so far, have not been completely diligent in preserving the original negatives of films they control....
In the future it will become even easier for old negatives to become lost and be "replaced" by new altered negatives. This would be a great loss to our society. Our cultural history must not be allowed to be rewritten...
The public's interest is ultimately dominant over all other interests.
People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an exercise of power are barbarians.. it will soon be possible to create a new "original" negative with whatever changes or alterations the copyright holder of the moment desires. The copyright holders, so far, have not been completely diligent in preserving the original negatives of films they control....
In the future it will become even easier for old negatives to become lost and be "replaced" by new altered negatives. This would be a great loss to our society. Our cultural history must not be allowed to be rewritten...
The public's interest is ultimately dominant over all other interests.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Picnic-At-Ha...dp/B0017WVSS8/
Last edited by Jay G.; 05-09-11 at 09:34 PM.
#1305
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hollywood Ca
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
Yes there is. There's the argument for the historical and social importance of the original cuts, which is why the National Film Registry has a copy of the original cut of Star Wars in its vaults, not the SE.
There's also the argument about original vs. current "intent" for the films. Lucas likes to claim that the SEs are how he always intended the films to be, but this is simply not true. Many of the more grievous changes were ones that could've easily been done back during the original editing (or shooting), while some he's even waffled on. Then there's the changes that are clearly just to make the original trilogy fit with the prequels better.
Finally, there's the point that, as far as directorial intent goes, Lucas was only the director of the first film. For the sequels, Lucas as producer is overriding the original directors' intent for those films, something he himself argued against in front of congress, 23 years ago.
http://savestarwars.com/lucasspeecha...aledition.html
It's clear that, as Lucas has gotten older, his concern for the public interest and our cultural history has waned in favor of constant tweaking of his pasts works, and the past works of others that he owns.
There's a UK DVD Set that contains both the theatrical and director's cut:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Picnic-At-Ha...dp/B0017WVSS8/
There's also the argument about original vs. current "intent" for the films. Lucas likes to claim that the SEs are how he always intended the films to be, but this is simply not true. Many of the more grievous changes were ones that could've easily been done back during the original editing (or shooting), while some he's even waffled on. Then there's the changes that are clearly just to make the original trilogy fit with the prequels better.
Finally, there's the point that, as far as directorial intent goes, Lucas was only the director of the first film. For the sequels, Lucas as producer is overriding the original directors' intent for those films, something he himself argued against in front of congress, 23 years ago.
http://savestarwars.com/lucasspeecha...aledition.html
It's clear that, as Lucas has gotten older, his concern for the public interest and our cultural history has waned in favor of constant tweaking of his pasts works, and the past works of others that he owns.
There's a UK DVD Set that contains both the theatrical and director's cut:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Picnic-At-Ha...dp/B0017WVSS8/
thanks for posting this, reading it really does get you to think.
#1306
DVD Talk Hero
re: Star Wars
I can't wait for the new edits to bring more changes and how the apologists will say how they were part of the original, artistic intent but couldn't be done in the last decade and a half. Gonna be fun!
#1307
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
This all goes back to earlier discussions in this thread about what other possible reasons Lucas has to tamper with the movies and keep changing them. We've speculated on his soured divorce with Marcia, who was a huge influence on the editing and pacing of the OT, as having fueled his desire to align the movies with his "original intent" as a way of separating his work from his wife's. It's a long shot but I think it helps to explain part of Lucas' underlying motivations.
He can't honestly believe that his changes have all served the movies positively. That's why he added the Luke ESB scream then removed it. He hears the fans. That's why Jar Jar had such a reduced role in AOTC and ROTS. He heard the complaints and had to acknowledge them.
SO, what is it about the OT that prevents Lucas from remastering and releasing pre-Special Edition versions, as a result of all the fans who've requested it and would gladly pay big bucks for them? He's demonstrated he listens to fans to some degree, even if it's small. I can only conclude and conjecture that there is something about the OT with which he has a bad, bad association. My unprofessional, slightly informed opinion is that it's bitterness over the divorce with his ex-wife and wanting to make sure he cuts her contributions out of the picture as much as he can. That's not the whole picture or even the biggest part, but it has to be an influence on his decision making.
Repost link: http://secrethistoryofstarwars.com/marcialucas.html
He can't honestly believe that his changes have all served the movies positively. That's why he added the Luke ESB scream then removed it. He hears the fans. That's why Jar Jar had such a reduced role in AOTC and ROTS. He heard the complaints and had to acknowledge them.
SO, what is it about the OT that prevents Lucas from remastering and releasing pre-Special Edition versions, as a result of all the fans who've requested it and would gladly pay big bucks for them? He's demonstrated he listens to fans to some degree, even if it's small. I can only conclude and conjecture that there is something about the OT with which he has a bad, bad association. My unprofessional, slightly informed opinion is that it's bitterness over the divorce with his ex-wife and wanting to make sure he cuts her contributions out of the picture as much as he can. That's not the whole picture or even the biggest part, but it has to be an influence on his decision making.
Repost link: http://secrethistoryofstarwars.com/marcialucas.html
#1308
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hollywood Ca
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
This all goes back to earlier discussions in this thread about what other possible reasons Lucas has to tamper with the movies and keep changing them. We've speculated on his soured divorce with Marcia, who was a huge influence on the editing and pacing of the OT, as having fueled his desire to align the movies with his "original intent" as a way of separating his work from his wife's. It's a long shot but I think it helps to explain part of Lucas' underlying motivations.
He can't honestly believe that his changes have all served the movies positively. That's why he added the Luke ESB scream then removed it. He hears the fans. That's why Jar Jar had such a reduced role in AOTC and ROTS. He heard the complaints and had to acknowledge them.
SO, what is it about the OT that prevents Lucas from remastering and releasing pre-Special Edition versions, as a result of all the fans who've requested it and would gladly pay big bucks for them? He's demonstrated he listens to fans to some degree, even if it's small. I can only conclude and conjecture that there is something about the OT with which he has a bad, bad association. My unprofessional, slightly informed opinion is that it's bitterness over the divorce with his ex-wife and wanting to make sure he cuts her contributions out of the picture as much as he can. That's not the whole picture or even the biggest part, but it has to be an influence on his decision making.
Repost link: http://secrethistoryofstarwars.com/marcialucas.html
He can't honestly believe that his changes have all served the movies positively. That's why he added the Luke ESB scream then removed it. He hears the fans. That's why Jar Jar had such a reduced role in AOTC and ROTS. He heard the complaints and had to acknowledge them.
SO, what is it about the OT that prevents Lucas from remastering and releasing pre-Special Edition versions, as a result of all the fans who've requested it and would gladly pay big bucks for them? He's demonstrated he listens to fans to some degree, even if it's small. I can only conclude and conjecture that there is something about the OT with which he has a bad, bad association. My unprofessional, slightly informed opinion is that it's bitterness over the divorce with his ex-wife and wanting to make sure he cuts her contributions out of the picture as much as he can. That's not the whole picture or even the biggest part, but it has to be an influence on his decision making.
Repost link: http://secrethistoryofstarwars.com/marcialucas.html
#1310
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
I know this has nothing to do with the point you're making in your post but for some odd reason, your mention of this made me think of a Seinfeld episode. Elaine and Kramer are at the diner and somehow the subject of "The Omen" comes up. Elaine asks Kramer something to the effect of "what was wrong with that kid, Damien?" Kramer says "Nothing, just a mischievous, rambunctious kid."
![Big Grin](/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#1311
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
I'm a little late to the party, but are the Blu-Rays going to be new edits, yet again? I was under the impression that they were just going to be the 2004 versions.
#1312
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
re: Star Wars
As for Jay G.'s thorough documentation of Lucas's previous positions, that's a pretty damning case to make. Unfortunately, it still comes down to "I made it, I own it, I can do what I want with it," which is what I really should have posited as his argument instead of "artistic intent."
#1313
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoda#Voice_and_animation
#1314
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
We know for a fact that puppet Yoda will be replaced with digital Yoda in The Phantom Menace, and it's largely expected there will be other tweaks, as well. As I and others have said for several years now, it will be very interesting to see how the Prequel Generation responds to their movies going under the knife. So far, they've not experienced this sensation that the OT Generation fans have endured and complained about since 1997.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ce_DVD_Release
I remember people bing miffed that there was no option to view the theatrical cut of Phantom Menace, which had previously been released on VHS and Laserdisc. I don't remember complaints about the changes to AOTC, or the one change to ROTS, but I had largely checked out of Star Wars by that point.
As for Jay G.'s thorough documentation of Lucas's previous positions, that's a pretty damning case to make. Unfortunately, it still comes down to "I made it, I own it, I can do what I want with it," which is what I really should have posited as his argument instead of "artistic intent."
So, sure, he has the legal right to change the works he owns and suppress the originals, but that doesn't mean we have to like it.
#1315
DVD Talk Limited Edition
re: Star Wars
There's nothing official, but there's rumors that the whole saga may be subject to final changes. The most notable is the replacement of the Yoda puppet in The Phantom Menace with CGI.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoda#Voice_and_animation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoda#Voice_and_animation
#1316
DVD Talk Godfather
re: Star Wars
I remember people bing miffed that there was no option to view the theatrical cut of Phantom Menace, which had previously been released on VHS and Laserdisc. I don't remember complaints about the changes to AOTC, or the one change to ROTS, but I had largely checked out of Star Wars by that point.
#1318
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
I do recall that the reason the changes to AOTC didn't get much flack was that he fixed something that was kinda dumb the first time around. When Padme falls out of that gunship and lands on a sand dune, in the original she's asked by one of the troopers if she's okay, and she gives a perky "yep!" like she's just been shopping at The Gap. For the DVD release, they redubbed her line to more of a groggy "...yeah..." that better reflects falling out of a moving vehicle onto a sand dune.
That's an example of a good fix. Some of the good fixes from the OT: fixing the compositing in the Luke vs the Rancor fight scene, which was overlooked in 97 but finally fixed in 2004. A scene that could use a good fix would be when Han says "I know a few maneuvers", then flies in a straight line. If that had been fixed for the SE's, that would be a little easier to accept.
But slapstick droids? Vader taking the shuttle cab back to the Star Destroyer?
Still, I maintain the opinion that the prequels are one good trip through the editing bay (with Lucas locked out of the room) from being decent B-movies. There's still underlying story issues, but they wouldn't be as much of a chore to watch with better pacing and some more character building deleted scenes put back in.
That's an example of a good fix. Some of the good fixes from the OT: fixing the compositing in the Luke vs the Rancor fight scene, which was overlooked in 97 but finally fixed in 2004. A scene that could use a good fix would be when Han says "I know a few maneuvers", then flies in a straight line. If that had been fixed for the SE's, that would be a little easier to accept.
But slapstick droids? Vader taking the shuttle cab back to the Star Destroyer?
Still, I maintain the opinion that the prequels are one good trip through the editing bay (with Lucas locked out of the room) from being decent B-movies. There's still underlying story issues, but they wouldn't be as much of a chore to watch with better pacing and some more character building deleted scenes put back in.
#1319
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
Technically speaking, Raiders of the Lost Ark is only available on DVD in an altered version; they digitally removed two FX flubs from the film that clearly weren't intended to be in the finished film. However, since these two changes are subtle and probably completely unnoticed by the majority of the public, there hasn't been a huge outcry.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raiders...Ark#Home_video
Edit: D'oh, fixed link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raiders...Ark#Home_video
Edit: D'oh, fixed link
#1321
DVD Talk Limited Edition
re: Star Wars
Totally agree with this. If Lucas just changes some subtle effects shots (Battle of Yavin comes to mind) or (changing Obiwans Home), fans like me wouldn't have been up in arms about the changes. Sure there would be a fanbase that would demand the originals, but it would be much smaller.
The change that tipped me over the edge was removing Shaw from the Ghost Scene and adding Hayden. That killed any argument for Saga fans to say, "Well, if you don't like the PT, you don't have to watch em!!" Well, now I have to see Hayden Christenson in ROTJ everytime I watch it you stupid idiots!
#1323
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
Another factor I think was that the DVD of AOTC was released only 6 months after the theatrical, while the DVD for TPM was released 1 1/2 years after the VHS, and over 2 years after the theatrical, meaning fans had more time to cement a previous version in their minds before the revised release.
If it's familiarity with previous versions that breeds contempt for changes, then any further changes to the prequels in the Blu-rays may spark more outrage than the previous changes did.
It's the changes that affect character, pacing, and tone that get people upset.
Here's another Raiders change, pretty subtle though, compared to Star Wars changes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_sFW8grQtU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_sFW8grQtU
With multiple angles and seamless branching features on DVD/Blu-ray, there's little reason why multiple versions of most films can't be included on the same disc.
#1324
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
![Smilie](/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#1325
DVD Talk Hall of Fame