Star Wars
#1276
DVD Talk Hero
re: Star Wars
I think what drives all the fans batshit is that Star Wars is the only movie franchise that disregards the theatrical version of it's product, as far as quality goes compared to the "new" product. I just find that logic to be crazy.
Can you imagine that practice happening with every other hollywood film? It's like saying, ok the director wasn't happy with the theatrical cut of Gladiator, so the consumer can never have it again. The consumer will now have to have this new "director's cut" of the movie and be happy with it.
Can you imagine that practice happening with every other hollywood film? It's like saying, ok the director wasn't happy with the theatrical cut of Gladiator, so the consumer can never have it again. The consumer will now have to have this new "director's cut" of the movie and be happy with it.
It's not George's to change and destroy the original.
#1277
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
I think what drives all the fans batshit is that Star Wars is the only movie franchise that disregards the theatrical version of it's product, as far as quality goes compared to the "new" product. I just find that logic to be crazy.
Can you imagine that practice happening with every other hollywood film? It's like saying, ok the director wasn't happy with the theatrical cut of Gladiator, so the consumer can never have it again. The consumer will now have to have this new "director's cut" of the movie and be happy with it.
Can you imagine that practice happening with every other hollywood film? It's like saying, ok the director wasn't happy with the theatrical cut of Gladiator, so the consumer can never have it again. The consumer will now have to have this new "director's cut" of the movie and be happy with it.
Now imagine Paul and the other Beatles agreeing to completely remove the original "Let It Be" and only sell the "naked" version as the only version available after so many grew up loving and knowing the original. It's unfathomable. Same goes with the original Star Wars trilogy.
How is that so hard to see for people like Amity?
#1278
DVD Talk Limited Edition
re: Star Wars
My point is that the die hards are so delusional as to believe that everyone feels that its manadtory to include the theatrical cuts.
And cant accept that there are many more consumers who are more than happy with the special editions, and the proof will be in how well these sell latter this year.
And cant accept that there are many more consumers who are more than happy with the special editions, and the proof will be in how well these sell latter this year.
That is why a SW Boxset will always sell, because there are enough older fans who love the movies and 'put up' with the SE.
#1280
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hollywood Ca
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
They realize they're a vocal minority.
You can continue to buy the same stuff over and over, no one cares that you're supporting an ego-maniac that doesn't give two shits about you, just your money (as his daughter also clearly knows).
Enjoy it! No one else cares. They should tide you over until the 3D versions in 2013.
You notice that those of "us" that won't be buying aren't criticizing those of "you" that will? Because it's not our money and we don't care. Why do you care? Because you're tired of the bitching? Cool. We're tired of being ignored.
You can continue to buy the same stuff over and over, no one cares that you're supporting an ego-maniac that doesn't give two shits about you, just your money (as his daughter also clearly knows).
Enjoy it! No one else cares. They should tide you over until the 3D versions in 2013.
You notice that those of "us" that won't be buying aren't criticizing those of "you" that will? Because it's not our money and we don't care. Why do you care? Because you're tired of the bitching? Cool. We're tired of being ignored.
i never said the die hards were criticzing those of us who are happy with the special editions, I said they cant believe or understand that most of us are quite allright and happy with the special editions.
there is a big difference.
#1281
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
re: Star Wars
Lucas's argument is simple. The current versions reflect his artistic intent. It's funny to me that elsewhere on this site, fans are adamant that they revere "director's cuts" over theatrical releases, but when it comes to Star Wars, artistic intent means nothing. It's as though fans feel because they've slept on Han Solo bedsheets and took a C-3PO lunch box to school that they're entitled to pass judgment on what Lucas does with the movies he made and owns.
#1282
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hollywood Ca
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
Lucas's argument is simple. The current versions reflect his artistic intent. It's funny to me that elsewhere on this site, fans are adamant that they revere "director's cuts" over theatrical releases, but when it comes to Star Wars, artistic intent means nothing. It's as though fans feel because they've slept on Han Solo bedsheets and took a C-3PO lunch box to school that they're entitled to pass judgment on what Lucas does with the movies he made and owns.
#1283
re: Star Wars
I get your point, and for most films it's completely true. The fanbase isn't big enough to see huge numbers of people clamoring for the "original" version and making it financially worthwhile to go to the trouble. But with Star Wars, it just might be big enough to make it worth their while.
But in either case, studios and creators doing things the right/complete way earn respect and future business, and is possibly financially rewarding in the long term.
This case is just George being George.
But in either case, studios and creators doing things the right/complete way earn respect and future business, and is possibly financially rewarding in the long term.
This case is just George being George.
#1285
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
re: Star Wars
Lucas's argument is simple. The current versions reflect his artistic intent. It's funny to me that elsewhere on this site, fans are adamant that they revere "director's cuts" over theatrical releases, but when it comes to Star Wars, artistic intent means nothing. It's as though fans feel because they've slept on Han Solo bedsheets and took a C-3PO lunch box to school that they're entitled to pass judgment on what Lucas does with the movies he made and owns.
I'm intelligent enough to assess changes and revisionism on an individual basis and accept or reject them on their own merits.
Coppola can keep Redux, Friedkin can keep TVYNS, and Lucas can keep his special editions where a driving forward momentum in the climax is retarded so that we can now see inessential shots of spacecraft taking off and landing- or see silly CG slapstick a-tonally sandwiched between sequences where the situations are tense and serious. These things seriously impair and impede my enjoyment of the show. They pull me out- just like Ridley Scott going back and color grading his classic films to be more in the Michael Bay school of teal & orange school of artifice, kills my enjoyment of his work now.
Out of my friends who are SW fans, (We are all in our late 30's), many will buy this BluRay set come September, but ALL of my friends prefer the OOT over the SE. They love SW too much to 'cut their nose to spite their face' that many others do. So every response from my friends who are buying this set, "Yeah, I wish I they had the OOT instead of the SE, but I can put up with the SE because I love SW so much."
If/when I buy the last three films on Bd, it will be to have what is essentially extended trailers for the two films I still love, but can no longer watch in a half-way decent way.
#1286
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
I'm reminded of Terry Gilliam, when asked about going back and making director's cuts of his films, particularly the "Final Director's Cut" of Brazil, said that he wouldn't want to do too much re-editing because for all intents and purposes, he's now a different person from the one that made those films. Changes he made now would not accurately reflect what he had intended the film to be when he was making it, even if he thought they did.
It's funny to me that elsewhere on this site, fans are adamant that they revere "director's cuts" over theatrical releases, but when it comes to Star Wars, artistic intent means nothing.
Also, while I appreciate director's cuts and many times prefer them to the theatrical cuts, I have come to see the value of making the theatrical cuts available. Even if the director hates the cut, it's how the film was originally seen, and may have been the only way it was seen for years or even decades. If someone prefers that cut, then they should be able to view it. This is why people were upset when only the "Director's Cut" of Blade Runner was available on DVD for years until the "Final Cut" set was released. Or the uproar that happened when the theatrical cut of 40-Year Old Virgin was originally only released in 4:3, not in OAR.
And, as has been pointed out, almost every other director beside Lucas seems to see the value in the theatrical cuts of their films, since they allow them to be made available, often on the same release as their preferred cut.
#1287
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
re: Star Wars
It bothers me a bit, but not enough to not buy the DVDs a few years back. I'll buy the blus only if he releases the originals properly, my DVDs will do just fine until/if then.
#1289
DVD Talk Legend
re: Star Wars
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raiders...Ark#Home_video
Edit: D'oh, fixed link
Last edited by Jay G.; 05-09-11 at 08:54 PM.
#1290
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Posts: 23,548
Received 678 Likes
on
458 Posts
re: Star Wars
Technically speaking, Raiders of the Lost Ark is only available on DVD in an altered version; they digitally removed two FX flubs from the film that clearly weren't intended to be in the finished film. However, since these two changes are subtle and probably completely unnoticed by the majority of the public, there hasn't been a huge outcry.
http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/hot-deals/1091687/
http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/hot-deals/1091687/
#1292
DVD Talk Hero
re: Star Wars
reading through these comments, I find it funny that so many of the diehards just cant accept that there are alot of us out here that are more than happy with the special editions, and dont think that the changes have ruined the original trilogy. would we like to see the original cuts included on the BD of course, but are we going to whine and complain about it, or refuse to buy or watch the movies ever again? NO!
Would you enjoy them less if the unaltered versions were available as well?
The issue isn't that the films have been changed, the issue is that there is an agenda on Lucasfilm's part to suppress the original versions of these films.
Whether you or George Lucas like it or not, the Star Wars movies are historically significant films. The 1977 version of "Star Wars" changed many things about the movie industry. It had revolutionary special effects and art direction. It was unlike anything that had been seen before.
And it is very sad that this version of the movie has been suppressed by its creator and replaced with a version that changes many of the things that made this a historically significant movie in the first place.
#1293
DVD Talk Limited Edition
re: Star Wars
1980 ESB: Luke does not scream when he falls in Cloud City after the Vader revelation.
1997 ESB/SE: Luke DOES scream when he falls in Cloud City after the Vader revelation.
2004 ESB/DVD: Luke does not scream when he falls in Cloud City after the Vader revelation.
If he wanted to exert his artistic intent, why did he change it in 1997 and then change it back in 2004? That isn't artistic intent, it is called tampering.
#1294
DVD Talk Hero
re: Star Wars
Also makes me wonder if Lucas put the scream in himself, or if he was just letting the special effects guys do whatever they wanted to.
#1295
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
re: Star Wars
What I believe doesn't matter. It's his argument, and there's no meaningful counter to that position. You can argue that what he's been doing is inane, nonsensical, contradictory, lame, etc. In a critical discussion about the nature of Lucas's work, those are all valid positions to take. But they are not sufficient when insisting that the creator/owner of these films has an obligation to produce and release a specific version of his work.
#1296
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Posts: 20,052
Received 168 Likes
on
126 Posts
re: Star Wars
The Criterion edition of Picnic at Hanging Rock is a director's cut by Peter Weir and the original theatrical version is not available on DVD. I don't think it's ever been released on any video format.
#1297
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hollywood Ca
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
What I believe doesn't matter. It's his argument, and there's no meaningful counter to that position. You can argue that what he's been doing is inane, nonsensical, contradictory, lame, etc. In a critical discussion about the nature of Lucas's work, those are all valid positions to take. But they are not sufficient when insisting that the creator/owner of these films has an obligation to produce and release a specific version of his work.
#1298
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re: Star Wars
What I believe doesn't matter. It's his argument, and there's no meaningful counter to that position. You can argue that what he's been doing is inane, nonsensical, contradictory, lame, etc. In a critical discussion about the nature of Lucas's work, those are all valid positions to take. But they are not sufficient when insisting that the creator/owner of these films has an obligation to produce and release a specific version of his work.
#1299
DVD Talk Hero
re: Star Wars
I find it sort of amusing whenever anyone ever talks about "artistic intent" on Lucas' part because he doesn't seem to project much passion or even enthusiasm about the Star Wars universe he created.
I'll watch the supplementary features on the DVDs, and it seems to strange to hear him talk about "laser swords" and "ray guns" like he's your ninety year old grandmother who's never seen the fucking movies. He also tends to call all Rodians "Greedos," like he's only seen the action figures. Can you imagine J.R.R. Tolkien calling elves "Legolases?"
Or in the documentaries he'll just wander into a room with a bunch of graphic designers and look at a wall of concept art and say I like that one and that one and that one like he's picking what to have for lunch off of a Chinese restaurant's take-out menu.
So all of the constant tinkering and suppression of the movies seems really strange, as he rarely comes off as someone who cares much about the movies.
I'll watch the supplementary features on the DVDs, and it seems to strange to hear him talk about "laser swords" and "ray guns" like he's your ninety year old grandmother who's never seen the fucking movies. He also tends to call all Rodians "Greedos," like he's only seen the action figures. Can you imagine J.R.R. Tolkien calling elves "Legolases?"
Or in the documentaries he'll just wander into a room with a bunch of graphic designers and look at a wall of concept art and say I like that one and that one and that one like he's picking what to have for lunch off of a Chinese restaurant's take-out menu.
So all of the constant tinkering and suppression of the movies seems really strange, as he rarely comes off as someone who cares much about the movies.