Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015, Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher
#4751
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
This was BEFORE the prequels, and in the early days of the internet. Since the magazine is date Feb 1997, the article inside dates back to at least the autumn of 1996. This was the first piece I remember reading that was critical of Star Wars in the mainstream science fiction press, which, at the time, was mostly limited to magazines like Starlog that ran puff pieces.
#4752
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
This is EXACTLY my personal feelings towards the films.
Here is my exact evolution:
1977: Loved Star Wars when I saw it at 5 years old, and that has never changed
1980: Did not like Empire when I saw it at 8 years old. Too dark, Yoda scenes were boring, didn't like the bad guys winning and thought the no-ending was lame.
1983: Loved Return when I saw it at 11 years old, ranked it right under Star Wars as my 2nd favorite of the trilogy
1990: Watched the Holy Trilogy when I was in HighSchool on SciFi Presidents Day Weekend for the first time in a few years. Totally reevaluated the movies: Empire was clearly my favorite now as it just hit me how great it was and how wrong I was as a kid. Star Wars was still great, but ranked #2 now. Noticed many flaws with Jedi now as the Jabba part went on too long, the Ewoks were lame, and Han's character was a shell of himself from Star Wars and Empire.
2014: Nothing has changed as Empire is my favorite, Star Wars is a close 2nd, and Jedi ranks a distant 3rd.
Last edited by mcnabb; 11-05-14 at 06:22 AM.
#4753
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I had a similar timeline to the last poster, however i continued to revisit the movies throughout the years on a regular basis. I loved all three movies when i first saw them. I was a child through all of them and so they were easy to love. Empire was always my favorite of the three. The movie felt different from the other two both esthetically and in the storyline. It felt like the heroes had gone from being champions at the end of the first movie and were in shit deep from the beginning of Empire. The colors, worlds and characters just made it even more interesting.
I look back at these movies and i can see why people have a problem with Ewoks, but to my 10 years old self at the time it was no big deal. A lot of movies in the 80's had similar type of creatures in their movies and it just seemed to be part and parcel of the time. But ROTJ had so much to love in it. The Jabba sequence was fun. Same for the Sarlac Pitt sequence. Endor was nicely realized and it has one of the best lightsabre duels and THE best space battle sequence out of al the movies.
In hindsight, i can see why Star Wars gets the respect (ahead of its time in special effects, good characters which is rare in a lot of Sci-Fi), but i actually find it rather dull. The one duel scene is really boring, the end X-wing tunnel run seems to go on forever, and there is something about the feel of the movie that is not as polished as the other two. I am probably one of the few people that prefers both sequels to the original Star Wars.
I look back at these movies and i can see why people have a problem with Ewoks, but to my 10 years old self at the time it was no big deal. A lot of movies in the 80's had similar type of creatures in their movies and it just seemed to be part and parcel of the time. But ROTJ had so much to love in it. The Jabba sequence was fun. Same for the Sarlac Pitt sequence. Endor was nicely realized and it has one of the best lightsabre duels and THE best space battle sequence out of al the movies.
In hindsight, i can see why Star Wars gets the respect (ahead of its time in special effects, good characters which is rare in a lot of Sci-Fi), but i actually find it rather dull. The one duel scene is really boring, the end X-wing tunnel run seems to go on forever, and there is something about the feel of the movie that is not as polished as the other two. I am probably one of the few people that prefers both sequels to the original Star Wars.
#4754
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
In hindsight, i can see why Star Wars gets the respect (ahead of its time in special effects, good characters which is rare in a lot of Sci-Fi), but i actually find it rather dull. The one duel scene is really boring, the end X-wing tunnel run seems to go on forever, and there is something about the feel of the movie that is not as polished as the other two. I am probably one of the few people that prefers both sequels to the original Star Wars.
The Obi-Wan/Vader duel in ANH is just painfully bad to watch today. It is so very slow and clunky. I realize that the actors were older and had no formal fighting skills, but man, it is just not fun to watch especially even moreso after some of the prequel fights like Maul vs Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon.
I also agree the Death Star trench run went on too long. It seems like Vader locks on to an X-Wing and says, "I have you now" and then five minutes later he actually fires. If you have him, then why does it take you so long to fire?
I also always wondered how Vader even survives the ending. Yes, his TIE is ricocheted away and not actually destroyed, but how does he get back to wherever the nearest Empire base is? The movie made it a point earlier to point out that a TIE isn't a deep-space capable craft. I don't think any Empire bases would be near Yavin, or else that wouldn't have been a very good hiding space for the Rebels. So Vader's TIE should have been stranded in deep-space, and he would have died. In ROTS, Palpatine could sense Vader in trouble on Mustafar, so maybe he could sense Vader in trouble at Yavin too. That's a bit of a retcon answer though since we didn't previously know Palpatine was capable of that until the PT.
#4755
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
In hindsight, i can see why Star Wars gets the respect (ahead of its time in special effects, good characters which is rare in a lot of Sci-Fi), but i actually find it rather dull. The one duel scene is really boring, the end X-wing tunnel run seems to go on forever, and there is something about the feel of the movie that is not as polished as the other two. I am probably one of the few people that prefers both sequels to the original Star Wars.
Let's just say this was 2014 and Star Wars was like E.T. or Lawrence of Arabia and could be seen as a standalone movie from ALL viewers. I don't think it would have as big as a fanbase as it does now (simply because there are so many SW fanbases: OOT, Saga, EU, etc.). But you would have the fans that love it from 1977, along with all new fans through the years that weren't tainted with comparisons of other SW films. Plus Star Wars wouldn't be a punch line that it is now because of the Prequels, or the fans in costumes getting interviewed by Conan O'Brien. And the fact that EVERYTHING that is said in it by Kenobi is a lie!
The Obi-Wan/Vader duel in ANH is just painfully bad to watch today. It is so very slow and clunky. I realize that the actors were older and had no formal fighting skills, but man, it is just not fun to watch especially even moreso after some of the prequel fights like Maul vs Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon.
.
Last edited by mcnabb; 11-05-14 at 08:15 AM.
#4756
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I think thats a valid point. If Star Wars never had sequels then it would be seen as more of a Sci-Fi classic in the realms of War of the Worlds, Forbidden Planet and the Time Machine. The sequels changed the perception, and also i guess the box office changed it to a large extent. It became a cultural phenomenon.
#4757
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I also always wondered how Vader even survives the ending. Yes, his TIE is ricocheted away and not actually destroyed, but how does he get back to wherever the nearest Empire base is? The movie made it a point earlier to point out that a TIE isn't a deep-space capable craft. I don't think any Empire bases would be near Yavin, or else that wouldn't have been a very good hiding space for the Rebels. So Vader's TIE should have been stranded in deep-space, and he would have died. In ROTS, Palpatine could sense Vader in trouble on Mustafar, so maybe he could sense Vader in trouble at Yavin too. That's a bit of a retcon answer though since we didn't previously know Palpatine was capable of that until the PT.
#4758
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I think thats a valid point. If Star Wars never had sequels then it would be seen as more of a Sci-Fi classic in the realms of War of the Worlds, Forbidden Planet and the Time Machine. The sequels changed the perception, and also i guess the box office changed it to a large extent. It became a cultural phenomenon.
And it would have been interesting where George Lucas's career went if he stopped with Star Wars and directed other non-SW projects. Well, he would be alot less rich!
#4759
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
#4760
#4761
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I also think that making the OOT a mythical unobtainable object has boosted their status a lot too. If you think the original unaltered Star Wars would hold up today visually then you probably haven't seen it in a while.
#4762
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I pretty much think the exact opposite. Star Wars is a phenomenon because of the sequels, prequels, merch and EU. It would be seen as the start of the special effects revolution but it would also be dwarfed by movies that came out only a year or two later like Superman, Close Encounters and Blade Runner.
I also think that making the OOT a mythical unobtainable object has boosted their status a lot too. If you think the original unaltered Star Wars would hold up today visually then you probably haven't seen it in a while.
#4763
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
The problem with the changes to the original trilogy is that mostly everything that's been done sticks out like a sore thumb compared to the rest of the scenes in the films and doesn't seem to fit. That and a lot of the add ons are just pointless shit that ultimately add nothing to the films. The changes that I would have made if any would just have been cosmetic things to fix errors or clean up scenes. The revisionist changes to make the originals more in line with the prequels for the most part don't work.
I guess I also tend to disagree about A New Hope being too slow. Overall the film moves at a pretty good pace if you ask me and there's a good sense of fun and adventure throughout most of it. The lightsaber battle maybe isn't the most exciting one in the franchise but for what it is it works fine. I wouldn't expect Obi-Wan to be doing a lot of fancy shit or anything in his old age and its the first lightsaber duel in the franchise so it gets a pass from me.
I don't really know if I have a particular order in mind for the trilogy. If I really had to I think I'd probably say The Empire Strikes Back is overall the most solid of the three. A New Hope probably is second best just because its the original and a lot of fun to watch. Then last would probably be Return of the Jedi even though I overall do still like it. I guess looking back on it from when I recently watched it the problems are more evident but still not enough that I really dislike the film. I just think it should have been more than one film to resolve the storyline from the original trilogy.
I guess I also tend to disagree about A New Hope being too slow. Overall the film moves at a pretty good pace if you ask me and there's a good sense of fun and adventure throughout most of it. The lightsaber battle maybe isn't the most exciting one in the franchise but for what it is it works fine. I wouldn't expect Obi-Wan to be doing a lot of fancy shit or anything in his old age and its the first lightsaber duel in the franchise so it gets a pass from me.
I don't really know if I have a particular order in mind for the trilogy. If I really had to I think I'd probably say The Empire Strikes Back is overall the most solid of the three. A New Hope probably is second best just because its the original and a lot of fun to watch. Then last would probably be Return of the Jedi even though I overall do still like it. I guess looking back on it from when I recently watched it the problems are more evident but still not enough that I really dislike the film. I just think it should have been more than one film to resolve the storyline from the original trilogy.
Last edited by Mike86; 11-05-14 at 11:31 AM.
#4764
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
The problem with the changes to the original trilogy is that mostly everything that's been done sticks out like a sore thumb compared to the rest of the scenes in the films and doesn't seem to fit. That and a lot of the add ons are just pointless shit that ultimately add nothing to the films. The changes that I would have made if any would just have been cosmetic things to fix errors or clean up scenes. The revisionist changes to make the originals more in line with the prequels for the most part don't work.
I guess I also tend to disagree about A New Hope being too slow. Overall the film moves at a pretty good pace if you ask me and there's a good sense of fun and adventure throughout most of it. The lightsaber battle maybe isn't the most exciting one in the franchise but for what it is it works fine. I wouldn't expect Obi-Wan to be doing a lot of fancy shit or anything in his old age and its the first lightsaber duel in the franchise so it gets a pass from me.
I guess I also tend to disagree about A New Hope being too slow. Overall the film moves at a pretty good pace if you ask me and there's a good sense of fun and adventure throughout most of it. The lightsaber battle maybe isn't the most exciting one in the franchise but for what it is it works fine. I wouldn't expect Obi-Wan to be doing a lot of fancy shit or anything in his old age and its the first lightsaber duel in the franchise so it gets a pass from me.
#4765
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
The same goes for the Wizard of Oz, as my niece and nephews love it just as every generation has since 1939. Yet, the movie looks just as 'outdated' as Star Wars, but each generation continues to love the movie.
That is why I keep saying if there weren't any sequels/prequels to Star Wars, there would be no context to say, "The effects are outdated compared too...." People would watch Star Wars in context that the movie was made in 1977, just like people watch The Wizard of Oz in context that the movie was made in 1939.
#4766
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
While I don't want anything like that done in a new "Special Edition" it is pretty painful to watch the Obi-Wan/Vader duel in ANH right after watching their duel in ROTS. I have marathoned the six movies in one weekend before, and that especially makes it stick out like a sore thumb watching the old slow clunky duel in ANH.
#4767
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I think it's a rather appropriate decline in fighting skills.
One was an old man, and the other was double dipped in lava. They were bound to be a little slow with the swordplay.
One was an old man, and the other was double dipped in lava. They were bound to be a little slow with the swordplay.
#4768
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
You've just made the argument for watching them 4-6, 1-3, and sort of hurts Lucas's argument to watch them 1-6 Watching it this way lets the viewer experience each movie in the context of the time it was made, so as movie progesses, so do the special effects, the fights, and the overall story.
#4769
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
You've just made the argument for watching them 4-6, 1-3, and sort of hurts Lucas's argument to watch them 1-6 Watching it this way lets the viewer experience each movie in the context of the time it was made, so as movie progesses, so do the special effects, the fights, and the overall story.
But a lot of the stuff works from a story point of view. If you want to leap to your own conclusions as to why the RotS fight is so different than the ANH fight you can chalk a lot of it up to the physical differences both characters went through in the years between as well as their own maturity as combatants. It becomes more of a mental showdown than a physical one and I can buy that. Similarly, the space battles in the OT are much smaller and have a different dynamic altogether but the story itself supports this by virtue of the fact that the OT battles are always fought between a small entity and a larger one vs. two more-or-less equally-matched armies in the PT.
I usually watch the movies in chronological order and aside from a couple wonky little quirks like Yoda not being properly introduced by name in TPM and all the botched stuff with Leia being a Skywalker the saga actually works, and the SE/DVD/Blu changes go a long way towards making that happen.
#4770
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
Hell, i even found the duel in ROTS to be boring. They were just twirling their lightsabres all the time and it felt rather stilted and to be trying too hard to be showy. "I have the high ground....." Ok. I understand the advantage, but just because of that Obi-wan beat Anakin? Kind of a pathetic way to win and i hoped for a legendary battle, but got another yawnfest.
#4771
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
Eh. I rather like the Old Ben vs. Vader fight. There's some emotional elements in the lightsaber uh...play that make it worthwhile.
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/8kpHK4YIwY4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/8kpHK4YIwY4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
#4772
DVD Talk Legend & 2021 TOTY Winner
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
#4773
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
After the prequels, any kind of narrative drive will be appreciated. The light saber and other fights were so bad because it seemed like nothing was actually at stake.
#4774
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I think its for the best if we all just pretend like the prequel trilogy never happened.
#4775
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I decided to watch some of the fights in the PT films. Jesus. I barely remembered them but holy fuck is there any lack of impact in them. Emotional or physical. It just lacks any impact whatsoever. Christopher Lee especially should have had no reason to be in there. That man could barely move in the scenes he has action in and then he goes cgi and it's jarring as hell.