Go Back  (BETA) DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

The 78th Annual Academy Awards Show Discussion

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

The 78th Annual Academy Awards Show Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-06, 04:12 AM
  #676  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Not to get in the middle of your debate but...there is a big difference between being influenced by the greats, using a specific style and creating your own sound versus taking something that is already existing(Robert Johnson CD), dropping the vocals(or some element) and rapping overtop of the music or beat that remains. Where's the originality in that? I see a big difference in the two.
Old 03-07-06, 04:32 AM
  #677  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
for me, regardless of whether or not i like the song, "hard out here for a pimp" was the most integral to its film. its construction drove the characters thru the plot. and for that reason, i was glad to see it rewarded over the sort of song that's composed to play over the credits.

by the way, does this song even use any samples from other songs? all i hear is a drum machine, a guitar and some reverb.

Last edited by Cygnet74; 03-07-06 at 04:41 AM.
Old 03-07-06, 04:46 AM
  #678  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ItsGreekToMe
Influenced by - Direct copy of. Apple meet orange.

I guess what bugs me the most is how callously sampling/stealing is done, as if it's no big deal.

I guess it's nothing new. For the most part, the next generation usually craps on the last generation's accomplishments. With any luck, you'll live long enough to see the generation after yours do the same thing to yours.

Have a nice day.
i'm sure it would surprise you to know that samples are actually licensed, negotiated, paid for and often credited in the liner notes... not "stolen". my god! that being the case, perhaps the last generation is simply "selling out"?

Last edited by Cygnet74; 03-07-06 at 04:48 AM.
Old 03-07-06, 07:04 AM
  #679  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cygnet74
i'm sure it would surprise you to know that samples are actually licensed, negotiated, paid for and often credited in the liner notes... not "stolen". my god! that being the case, perhaps the last generation is simply "selling out"?
Not really. I remember reading about the legal issues back in the '90s. I still don't like it, nor does it demonstrate creativity in the 'artists' who do it.

Perhaps 'stealing' in a 'George Lucas stole my childhood' kind of way. (As in, songs you grew up with and loved that are now being used in a, IMHO, stupid way.)
Old 03-07-06, 07:57 AM
  #680  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 12,375
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Me, I'm still pissed at that no-talent hack Tchaikovsky STEALING the Marseillaise and "God Save the Tsar" for his 1812 Overture. Just ripped them off note for note -- of course, that wasn't even the first time that loser sampled "GStT", either. OMG, what a thief, the world's going to hell in a handbasket, etc. It's hard out here for a pimpsky.
Old 03-07-06, 08:01 AM
  #681  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Gil Jawetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: I was here but I disappear
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ItsGreekToMe
Influenced by - Direct copy of. Apple meet orange.

I guess what bugs me the most is how callously sampling/stealing is done, as if it's no big deal.

I guess it's nothing new. For the most part, the next generation usually craps on the last generation's accomplishments. With any luck, you'll live long enough to see the generation after yours do the same thing to yours.

Have a nice day.
First off, as has been said before, this thread is not about sampling. Secondly, the entire argument is moot because once the laws were re-written to prevent wily-nilly sampling (in 1991?) the whole technique changed, since producers could no longer just use what they thought sounded good and had to clear everything. I agree that clearing samples makes sense and is fair to the original artists but from a purely artistic stand-point most of the best sampling was done before clearance was required, for fairly obvious reasons. Now sampling mostly just means Diddy paying Michael Jackson $5 million dollars so he can take an entire MJ instrumental and mumble over it. Obviously that's stupid. The song that sparked this debate - Fight THe Power - is built on a cacophony of samples from numerous sources that are each treated the way a painter would treat one color of paint: Blended, mixed, rearranged, and spit back out unrecognizable. If anything it was done out of love for the originals and for the art of music. It wasn't cynical marketing (like the Diddy brand of sampling that assumes that people will buy a new song if it sounds just like Billie Jean or whatever) but actual passionate music making. Only underground artists who don't care about record labels or artists like DJ Shadow who have enormous libraries of obscure sources can really come close to that today. That's also why online mashup artists are so popular.
Old 03-07-06, 08:05 AM
  #682  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Gil Jawetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: I was here but I disappear
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cygnet74
by the way, does this song even use any samples from other songs? all i hear is a drum machine, a guitar and some reverb.
I'm sure it doesn't use any, which is why this discussion is so wacky. I made the mistake of mentioning that Fight The Power was inelligible back in 1989 because it did use samples and all hell broke loose.

But I dare anyone to do a side by side comparison of those two songs and suggest that Pimp is better.
Old 03-07-06, 08:18 AM
  #683  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dork
Me, I'm still pissed at that no-talent hack Tchaikovsky STEALING the Marseillaise and "God Save the Tsar" for his 1812 Overture. Just ripped them off note for note -- of course, that wasn't even the first time that loser sampled "GStT", either. OMG, what a thief, the world's going to hell in a handbasket, etc. It's hard out here for a pimpsky.

Hey Dennis, there's a reason you got fired from Monday Night Football.
Old 03-07-06, 08:21 AM
  #684  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 12,375
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
I didn't make any 70s TV references.
Old 03-07-06, 08:34 AM
  #685  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 9,866
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ItsGreekToMe
sycophant \SIK-uh-fuhnt\, noun:
A person who seeks favor by flattering people of wealth or influence; a parasite; a toady.
Old 03-07-06, 10:57 AM
  #686  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ItsGreekToMe
Sorry, but on some topics, I'm not very reasonable, and this is one of them. To me, it's a sacred thing.
Everyone should quit talking about it with this guy, since this comment pretty much says, "I'm ignorant to the subject at hand and I refuse to be open-minded about it."

You've written off an entire genre because of your fear of something you just don't understand. My mom grew up a huge Beatles fan and music lover. If you flipped through her collection of LPs, you saw pretty much every great or recognizable band in there from the '60s-'80s. And guess what else was in there? A Run-DMC LP. Yep, my freakin' mom owns a hip-hop album? And why? Because she's open-minded and doesn't limit her tastes to a narrow range of genres.

I'm curious as to what hip-hop you've heard, anyway. Because there's a great deal of it that's more musical than a lot of that three-chord, hollow BS that passes for rock today.
Old 03-07-06, 11:03 AM
  #687  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mopower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Janitor's closet in Kinnick Stadium
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Al Padrino
Everyone should quit talking about it with this guy, since this comment pretty much says, "I'm ignorant to the subject at hand and I refuse to be open-minded about it."

You've written off an entire genre because of your fear of something you just don't understand. My mom grew up a huge Beatles fan and music lover. If you flipped through her collection of LPs, you saw pretty much every great or recognizable band in there from the '60s-'80s. And guess what else was in there? A Run-DMC LP. Yep, my freakin' mom owns a hip-hop album? And why? Because she's open-minded and doesn't limit her tastes to a narrow range of genres.

I'm curious as to what hip-hop you've heard, anyway. Because there's a great deal of it that's more musical than a lot of that three-chord, hollow BS that passes for rock today.

Yeah but Run DMC is actually good.
Old 03-07-06, 12:49 PM
  #688  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sacremende (by way of the worst place on Earth: cincinnati, ky)
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rfduncan
What's funny is the poster does the exact same thing on the very next post.
Old 03-07-06, 01:09 PM
  #689  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Michael Corvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 62,509
Received 909 Likes on 644 Posts
This is way off topic, but to continue the debate read on...

Originally Posted by Cygnet74
i'm sure it would surprise you to know that samples are actually licensed, negotiated, paid for and often credited in the liner notes... not "stolen". my god! that being the case, perhaps the last generation is simply "selling out"?
That may be the case but it doesn't change the fact that they took something that was existing to make a quick buck instead of creating something new and fresh.

It would be like DaVinci taking Michaelangelo's "Creation of Adam" and painting in his own Adam because he didn't like the fact that he had a navel when he shouldn't have. Even if Michaelangelo gave him permission, it still isn't creative, it's a hackjob no matter how well it was done. We all know the original despite what was done to it.

I guess it all comes down to how creative the outcome is, but to me it still signifies a lack of creativity in and of itself, a sign of laziness, and a lack of overall talent.

All that being said, I don't hate any of it. I choose to listen to what I like, and if the geezer rock stars want to sell out like that, who am I to judge? I do agree though about awards limiting the nominees to ORIGINAL songs where there is no sampling present.
Old 03-07-06, 11:22 PM
  #690  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Al Padrino
Everyone should quit talking about it with this guy, since this comment pretty much says, "I'm ignorant to the subject at hand and I refuse to be open-minded about it."
A> Don't make up things about me that I didn't say. What you have just demonstrated is how the safety and anonymity of typing on the internet can turn people into condescending SOBs.

Originally Posted by Al Padrino
You've written off an entire genre because of your fear of something you just don't understand.
B & C> I never said I feared ANYTHING and I never said I didn't understand anything. That is your creation. Again, see A>.

Originally Posted by Al Padrino
I'm curious as to what hip-hop you've heard, anyway. Because there's a great deal of it that's more musical than a lot of that three-chord, hollow BS that passes for rock today.
And now YOU have written off an entire genre. Was that because you feared it or didn't understand it?

In the future you may want to reconsider speaking for an entire forum or 'typing' behind someone's back. It looks cheap and childish and displays a complete lack of integrity.

Good day to you, Sir.
Old 03-08-06, 07:42 AM
  #691  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Chew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: South of Titletown
Posts: 18,628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm still laughing at the fact that "Da Colbert Code" was 5/5 with it's predictions.
Old 03-09-06, 05:56 PM
  #692  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to bump this, but...

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
- 3-6 Mafia - I don't mind the song winning, or even being nominated, but take a look around fellas, this ain't the Source or MTV awards. Rent a fucking tux.
Old 03-09-06, 06:17 PM
  #693  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Capitol of the Empire! Center of all Commerce and Culture! Crossroads of Civilization! NEW ROME!!!...aka New York City
Posts: 10,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
That may be the case but it doesn't change the fact that they took something that was existing to make a quick buck instead of creating something new and fresh.
http://www.moire.com/beastieboys/samples/index.php

I CHALLENGE you to tell me that the above is NOT one of the most origional albums OF ALL TIME, ANY GENRE

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.