Go Back  (BETA) DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Star Trek XI in 2008 Written/Directed by JJ Abrams

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Star Trek XI in 2008 Written/Directed by JJ Abrams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-08, 10:37 PM
  #451  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by reverie
...And it seems Scotty actually grew more hair as time went on.
So much for the long-time complaint about Patrick Stewart as captain of the Enterprise; i.e. that by the 23rd century there should be a cure for baldness.

I guess Scotty didn't pass along the info to Picard.
Jon2 is offline  
Old 08-12-08, 11:53 PM
  #452  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,860
Received 216 Likes on 155 Posts
Originally Posted by riley_dude
I still think they are going to do some better marketing than this to get newbies in the theater.
Trek has a bad name with most mainstream audiences. Marketing has to change that.
Exactly. I'm not a trek fan, never have been...I'm the type that laughs at trekkies.... BUT so far I'm very interested in seeing this film. I'm the type of movie-goer that Paramount wants.... so if they give me a good preview (and movie), I'll be there.
Artman is offline  
Old 08-13-08, 10:59 AM
  #453  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18,354
Received 324 Likes on 242 Posts
I don't think "TREK" has a bad name...I just think they haven't put out a lot of good movies. The Box Office shows that when they do make a good film, people will flock to it (Voyage Home, First Contact).
Shannon Nutt is offline  
Old 09-08-08, 07:39 PM
  #454  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,572
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts
Anyone see this commerical of Star Trek KFC?
They did a good job trying to match the actors from the original show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZBTDlvShYg

Last edited by Match; 09-08-08 at 07:44 PM.
Match is offline  
Old 09-08-08, 09:30 PM
  #455  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Falc04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Match
Anyone see this commerical of Star Trek KFC?
They did a good job trying to match the actors from the original show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZBTDlvShYg

wow...excellent likeness to the original series cast!
Falc04 is offline  
Old 09-09-08, 03:38 AM
  #456  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
MBoyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: AUSTIN - Land of Mexican Coke
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Was that on TV? If so, I am surprised Paramount approved it because of the relaunch.
MBoyd is offline  
Old 09-09-08, 08:20 AM
  #457  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Phantom Zone
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Falc04
wow...excellent likeness to the original series cast!
For a minute there I thought it was the original cast!
Yavin is offline  
Old 09-09-08, 04:58 PM
  #458  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nightmare Alley
Posts: 17,117
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From AMC blog:
AMC: How do you react to William Shatner's ire at not having a role in the movie?

JJ Abrams: It was very tricky. We actually had written a scene with him in it that was a flashback kind of thing, but the truth is, it didn't quite feel right. The bigger thing was that he was very vocal that he didn't want to do a cameo. We tried desperately to put him in the movie, but he was making it very clear that he wanted the movie to focus on him significantly, which, frankly, he deserves. The truth is, the story that we were telling required a certain adherence to the Trek canon and consistency of storytelling. It's funny -- a lot of the people who were proclaiming that he must be in this movie were the same people saying it must adhere to canon. Well, his character died on screen. Maybe a smarter group of filmmakers could have figured out how to resolve that.
Shatner "wanted the movie to focus on him significantly" did he? Why does that not surprise me?
NoirFan is offline  
Old 09-09-08, 09:52 PM
  #459  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by NoirFan
Shatner "wanted the movie to focus on him significantly" did he? Why does that not surprise me?
Why should it?

While Roddenberry described Trek as "Wagon Train to the stars," he also referred to Kirk as a Horatio Hornblower in space - meaning the main focus of the series was his character. Which is what I think Shatner is probably about.
Jon2 is offline  
Old 09-09-08, 10:05 PM
  #460  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Numanoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Down in 'The Park'
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Match
Anyone see this commerical of Star Trek KFC?
They did a good job trying to match the actors from the original show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZBTDlvShYg
NERD ALERT!!!:




That's Next Generation china!
Numanoid is offline  
Old 09-09-08, 11:57 PM
  #461  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a lot of the people who were proclaiming that he must be in this movie were the same people saying it must adhere to canon. Well, his character died on screen. Maybe a smarter group of filmmakers could have figured out how to resolve that.
A) Shatner himself resolved that with the Star Trek novels he's "written".

B) There's a good chunk of time between Star Trek VI and Generations.

C) No fan expects Star Trek to adhere to the canon of turdfests like Generations, Voyager, and Star Trek V -- only the good movies count.
Sean O'Hara is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 12:30 AM
  #462  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 17,000
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
B) There's a good chunk of time between Star Trek VI and Generations.
Didn't they take place in the same year?
Rockmjd23 is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 12:34 AM
  #463  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by Falc04
wow...excellent likeness to the original series cast!
Except for Sulu. I guess they figured "any Asian will do".
Groucho is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 01:46 AM
  #464  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Josh-da-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Bible Belt
Posts: 43,820
Received 2,694 Likes on 1,858 Posts
Well, you could pretend that, in Generations, Picard never left the Matrix, or whatever the hell it was, and that everything that happened in Generations after Picard entered the fantasyland and everything that came after it was just Picard living out a fantasy life.

So Captain Kirk never actually died because he never left the Matrix thing because that was just a fantasy of Picard's. Though you do have a problem with Worf, since he went on to join the crew of DS9.

You could also make the claim that Kirk (and Picard and Guinan) is still in the Nexus (Nexus... not Matrix... wrong franchise) because it appears to exist outside of normal time. So Kirk is always in it at any point in time.

Last edited by Josh-da-man; 09-10-08 at 01:49 AM.
Josh-da-man is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 06:57 AM
  #465  
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: spiritually, Minnesota
Posts: 36,876
Received 674 Likes on 450 Posts
I mentioned this somewhere, maybe earlier in this thread, but it would have been incredibly easy to "save" Kirk at the end of Generations.

Instead of falling to his death (the lamest death for a major character ever), they should have just had him fall into the matrix.
Trevor is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 07:06 AM
  #466  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Too snarky for September '08
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by riley_dude
Trek has a bad name with most mainstream audiences.

Only because most mainstream audiences are flat-out idiots.
RTisBetter is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 08:08 AM
  #467  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18,354
Received 324 Likes on 242 Posts
JJ Abrams:...Well, his character died on screen. Maybe a smarter group of filmmakers could have figured out how to resolve that.
Hello? This is a time travel movie where Spock goes into the past. Couldn't/wouldn't (considering what Kirk did for him in STAR TREK III) Spock do something that might prevent/warn Kirk about his fate in the future? Illogical yes, but Spock's human side would certainly come into play where Kirk as concerned.

"Smarter group of filmmakers?" Even a casual TREK fan could solve the "problem" of Kirk's death in GENERATIONS.

I'm STILL not 100% buying that JJ didn't use Shatner in the film...his answer sounds like a prepared one he told Bill he was going to use as "cover".
Shannon Nutt is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 08:16 AM
  #468  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by RTisBetter
Only because most mainstream audiences are flat-out idiots.
Yes, because Star Trek is so nuanced and clever, only the most intelligent of us can understand it.
Groucho is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 08:21 AM
  #469  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Too snarky for September '08
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Groucho
Yes, because Star Trek is so nuanced and clever, only the most intelligent of us can understand it.

Um... yeah?

Why are you laughing you dumb pygmy?
RTisBetter is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 08:40 AM
  #470  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Chew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: South of Titletown
Posts: 18,628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Numanoid
That's Next Generation china!
Nice catch.
Chew is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 10:14 AM
  #471  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by RTisBetter
Why are you laughing you dumb pygmy?
Now now, none of that. I'll have you know that most Pygmies are much taller than me.
Groucho is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 10:18 AM
  #472  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
Hello? This is a time travel movie where Spock goes into the past. Couldn't/wouldn't (considering what Kirk did for him in STAR TREK III) Spock do something that might prevent/warn Kirk about his fate in the future? Illogical yes, but Spock's human side would certainly come into play where Kirk as concerned.
STXII is a time travel movie? Oh, god.
Tracer Bullet is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 10:34 AM
  #473  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Chew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: South of Titletown
Posts: 18,628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet
STXII is a time travel movie? Oh, god.
Woah there buddy, let's not get ahead of ourselves! We're here to complain about XI first. The weekend it's released is when we can start complaining about XII.


Chew is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 10:45 AM
  #474  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,453
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by MBoyd
Was that on TV? If so, I am surprised Paramount approved it because of the relaunch.
Why? Getting Star Trek out there as much as possible would be a good thing.
Double_Oh_7 is offline  
Old 09-10-08, 12:46 PM
  #475  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Chew
Woah there buddy, let's not get ahead of ourselves! We're here to complain about XI first. The weekend it's released is when we can start complaining about XII.




Oh, who can keep track anymore. It's not even going to be called Star Trek XI, is it?
Tracer Bullet is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.