Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Star Wars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-11, 12:53 AM
  #376  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hollywood Ca
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by fumanstan
The 3D versions are being released in theatres 1 per year starting in 2012, so this is definately not going to be anything dealing with that.
I think its just going to be announcing the official release date for the set come 4th qtr.
Old 01-05-11, 10:51 AM
  #377  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Relocated to Bot-Hell
Posts: 11,819
Received 239 Likes on 175 Posts
re: Star Wars

Look forward to the announcement and getting the movies on BD.
Old 01-05-11, 01:54 PM
  #378  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Josh Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 11,759
Received 254 Likes on 180 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by MBoyd
What if the original original films are pack in only in new HD restored transfers . . . but in 3D only!
My prediction: Lucas will announce brand new HD restorations for all films, but only the 3D conversions. The 2D versions will be relegated to SD on the same discs. Star Wars in 2D is a "bonus feature," not a real movie, now that George Lucas has decided that he always wanted Star Wars in 3D all along.

I have a bad feeling about this.
Old 01-05-11, 02:47 PM
  #379  
DVD Talk Legend
 
JimRochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Rochester, NY. USA
Posts: 18,014
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Josh Z
My prediction: Lucas will announce brand new HD restorations for all films, but only the 3D conversions. The 2D versions will be relegated to SD on the same discs. Star Wars in 2D is a "bonus feature," not a real movie, now that George Lucas has decided that he always wanted Star Wars in 3D all along.

I have a bad feeling about this.
Why did he ever make these things in the first place if they were so far from his vision? Poor tormented artist. Are we supposed to feel sorry for him?
Old 01-05-11, 02:54 PM
  #380  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by JimRochester
Are we supposed to feel sorry for him?
Yes. Remember, he's an independent filmmaker. That's why he needed to make a $billion prequel merchandise deal with Pepsico. Otherwise, he might have starved to death while duct-taping cardboard spaceships together.
Old 01-05-11, 03:10 PM
  #381  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
I compare quality with the terms "better" or "worse". Whether one film is more "sophisticated" than the other in certain areas is only tangentially related to the actual quality of the film. As I pointed out with the storyline example, something can be more "sophisticated" without actually being better.



It's interesting you left off some pretty important factors that people use to judge a film:
  • Acting - James Earl Jones is Darth Vader, despite being just a voice over. Add in the stellar performances in Empire, and the original trilogy owns over the wooden perfomances in the prequels (which I mostly blame the director for).
  • Story/Pacing - Although I described the plots for the prequels as more "sophisticated", the execution of said plots is overly convoluted with uneven pacing. In contrast, the OT have simpler plots, but are well executed with breakneck pacing.

As for the things you did comment on:
  • visual effects - overdone in the prequels. Lucas likes to fill the frame with stuff, which makes it busy and unfocused. The opening starship dogfight in Ep III left me bored, while the Death Star trench battle in Star Wars is tension-packed. The pod race in ep 1 looks like a video game (which it soon was).
  • dialog - Empire trumps all others in terms of dialogue, which means OT wins by default. Even then, I think the prequels had more cringe-inducing dialogue in each film than the other two originals combined.
  • stunts - Does it count as a "stunt" if it's on a green-screen with wires? The stunts were probably more "dynamic" in the prequels, but I'm not sure if they were as realistic or as interesting.
  • production design - gritty and real in the OT, shiny and fake looking in the prequels.
  • costuming - I think you're forgetting that in the OT, the aliens and droids count as costuming, versus the CGI creations of the prequels. Plus, the OT has so many iconic outfits, like Leia's "headphone" hairdo, and the aforementioned bikini. I can't even remember any of Amidala's outfits. Also, don't forget Darth Vader's costume, which originated in the OT and beats out any of the other Darth's costumes in the OT.
  • cinematography - I don't think being "more dynamic" equates to "better." The shot of Luke staring out at two suns on Tatooine is completely static, yet stays burned in your brain.
  • music - As pointed out, the prequels recycled a lot of themes. However, the original sequels did the same, yet added new themes that are instantly recognizable, like the Imperial March and Love Theme in Empire. Aside from Dual of the Fates, which is excellent, I can't think of any other recognizable themes originating from the prequels.

I agree with you on every single point.
Old 01-05-11, 03:22 PM
  #382  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by stingermck
Seems so far away. And the fact I will be almost 40 by the time Jedi hits...

Id rather see the energy devoted to 7-9, Dark Empire, Heir to the Empire, anything with the original cast at their current age.

from what I understand, any sequels would be years after Luke and Leia and wouldn't include the original cast.
Old 01-05-11, 03:35 PM
  #383  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by MBoyd
What if the original original films are pack in only in new HD restored transfers . . . but in 3D only!
If they were the totally original, as released in the theaters in 77, 80, and 83 versions of the OT, but were only available as a pack-in and 3D...I'd probably buy it.
Old 01-05-11, 03:36 PM
  #384  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Ignohippo
from what I understand, any sequels would be years after Luke and Leia and wouldn't include the original cast.
Well, considering that Lucas has publicly changed his mind about what any sequels would consist of and whether or not they will ever come to be more times than grains of sand that irritate Anakin's jockey shorts, I will be sure to put some appropriate perspective on what you "understand".
Old 01-05-11, 03:58 PM
  #385  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Ignohippo
I agree with you on every single point.
As do I. And it's more than an opinion; it's the truth.

Originally Posted by Suprmallet
If they were the totally original, as released in the theaters in 77, 80, and 83 versions of the OT, but were only available as a pack-in and 3D...I'd probably buy it.
That might be the only thing that would sway me to 3-D in the home....but I doubt it. I'm likely to be disinterested in 3-D until they can do it sans the glasses.Oh, and it has to be established as the new standard of television, too. That's going to take quite some time, I'm sure....if it ever happens.

But I did see a news report today that said that 3-D sales are down, enough to warrant...a news report.
Old 01-05-11, 04:02 PM
  #386  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

I'm really hoping that there's some catch to these blu-rays that will screw the fans. I'm starting to get entertained by Lucas' sadism.
Old 01-05-11, 04:09 PM
  #387  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Travis McClain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 7,758
Received 176 Likes on 116 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by toddly6666
I'm really hoping that there's some catch to these blu-rays that will screw the fans. I'm starting to get entertained by Lucas' sadism.
Says the guy who is actively hoping that a 90 minute rant ruins the prequels for the fans content to like 'em. Did George Lucas steal your girlfriend at some point?
Old 01-05-11, 04:45 PM
  #388  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
tylergfoster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
re: Star Wars

The only points in the bullet point post above I disagree with is the one about the battles. I think the podrace is fun, the sonic-bomb sequence in Episode II is kinda neat and the space battle that opens Episode III is legitimately thrilling.
Old 01-05-11, 06:34 PM
  #389  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by JimRochester
Why did he ever make these things in the first place if they were so far from his vision? Poor tormented artist. Are we supposed to feel sorry for him?
I don't feel sorry for Lucas. The people who have spent the last 15 years going absolutely nuts over what he's done (to his own property, mind you) on the other hand... well they do deserve our pity.

Ultimately I'm all for a "Close Encounters" or "Blade Runner"-style archival presentation in which the viewer is allowed to chose their preferred version but what you and I want are insignificant drops in the bucket compared to what Lucas wants. The sense of entitlement among OT nerds is pretty arrogant in that respect, and you can't really make the case that Lucas is the one being stubborn and hurting the franchise because none of the bitching and moaning has had any real impact on sales or popularity. For every vocal OT purist online there are ten people who don't give a crap who are more than willing to fork over the dough for the altered versions... and then there are the "I'll buy it but I don't have to be happy about it!" people, a portion of the OT purists that I think is a lot bigger than anyone knows.

Last edited by Guru Askew; 01-05-11 at 06:46 PM.
Old 01-05-11, 11:40 PM
  #390  
Fok
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Fok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Canada, BC
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

I can't help it, I'll be buying all the new versions and re-releases
Old 01-06-11, 08:42 AM
  #391  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Fok
I can't help it, I'll be buying all the new versions and re-releases
Fok that.





Old 01-06-11, 12:09 PM
  #392  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
re: Star Wars

I hope Lucas has replaced Harrison Ford with Shia LaBeouf in the OT versions.
Old 01-06-11, 12:43 PM
  #393  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,767
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
re: Star Wars

What time is the announcement today?
Old 01-06-11, 12:45 PM
  #394  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
re: Star Wars

1 more hour.
Old 01-06-11, 12:46 PM
  #395  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Toddarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northeastern Wisconsin
Posts: 4,466
Received 819 Likes on 543 Posts
re: Star Wars

I thought I read it was at 3pm pacific time.
Old 01-06-11, 12:49 PM
  #396  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Toddarino
I thought I read it was at 3pm pacific time.
11:30AM PST IIRC.

I could be there right now, but I'm lazy, wanted sleep this morning and I don't want to deal with the chaos of the first official day of the convention.
Old 01-06-11, 12:54 PM
  #397  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,767
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
re: Star Wars

Yeah, TFN says 2:30 pm ET.

Almost there!
Old 01-06-11, 01:27 PM
  #398  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
re: Star Wars

September. Wow early.
Old 01-06-11, 01:33 PM
  #399  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

was that it? Just a date announcement?
Old 01-06-11, 01:36 PM
  #400  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
re: Star Wars

http://starwars.com/themovies/saga/p...ray/index.html


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.