Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015, Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher
#4577
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
That's the sci-fi conception of a cyborg. The actual definition is someone with mechanical or electronic body augmentation. A more restrictive definition says that the augmentation needs to provide feedback to the person's brain. Luke's hand does that -- Luke flinches when the droid pokes his hand at the end of Empire. He's a cyborg.
#4578
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I always thought Andy would be playing a villain. He'd be a great Yuuzhan Vong.
Rumors have been all over the place.
I thought Luke was a captive? Or being hunted by Sith and Empire?
Rumors have been all over the place.
I thought Luke was a captive? Or being hunted by Sith and Empire?
#4579
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
That's the sci-fi conception of a cyborg. The actual definition is someone with mechanical or electronic body augmentation. A more restrictive definition says that the augmentation needs to provide feedback to the person's brain. Luke's hand does that -- Luke flinches when the droid pokes his hand at the end of Empire. He's a cyborg.
Spoiler:
Last edited by joe_b; 10-02-14 at 11:37 AM.
#4580
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
As for Tatooine even though there are other planets I'd like to see explored I think that's going to show up often just because its where everything all started and like someone mentioned about roots I think that play will always tie the universe (or at least the Skywalker family) together.
#4581
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I've got a bad feeling about this.
#4582
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I seriously doubt JJ would go that story route or that KK would even green light that. You'd be alienating pretty much all of Star Wars fans at that point, even more so than all 3 prequel films combined did.
So yeah, I don't believe it.
So yeah, I don't believe it.
#4583
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
Honestly I have a hard time believing that rumor is true. Abrams has to know that pulling shit like that will piss people off. That's George Lucas prequel trilogy bullshit if its true.
#4584
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
http://www.totalfilm.com/news/david-...rn-of-the-jedi
David Cronenberg explains why he turned down Return Of The Jedi
...A long time ago I was approached for one second to do a Star Wars movie, which at that time was called Revenge Of The Jedi and then became Return Of The Jedi.
I was approached by Lucasfilm about that and it didn't take them long to realize that maybe that wasn't a good idea. You're really restricted by the format that's been established.
So for a really inventive or innovative director, that's being put in a straitjacket. And the visual style has been established and the characters have been cast - I mean,
you're not involved in casting the leads, which is of course, for a director, a hugely important thing...
David Cronenberg explains why he turned down Return Of The Jedi
...A long time ago I was approached for one second to do a Star Wars movie, which at that time was called Revenge Of The Jedi and then became Return Of The Jedi.
I was approached by Lucasfilm about that and it didn't take them long to realize that maybe that wasn't a good idea. You're really restricted by the format that's been established.
So for a really inventive or innovative director, that's being put in a straitjacket. And the visual style has been established and the characters have been cast - I mean,
you're not involved in casting the leads, which is of course, for a director, a hugely important thing...
Wasn't David Lynch seriously talked about for ROTJ? Wasn't Marquand basically picked so that Lucas could sort of have more creative control, as well as because of the Guild controversies?
Incidentally, apparently Paul Verhoeven, who of course later went on to have a long career making sci-fi action movies, was apparently approached based on the strength of his Dutch work, I think Soldier of Orange in particular. Apparently, they were more reticent after seeing Turkish Delight, Verhoeven say he thinks maybe they were concerned that "the Jedi would start fucking right away."
![LOL](/images/smilies/lol.gif)
#4585
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
That's the sci-fi conception of a cyborg. The actual definition is someone with mechanical or electronic body augmentation. A more restrictive definition says that the augmentation needs to provide feedback to the person's brain. Luke's hand does that -- Luke flinches when the droid pokes his hand at the end of Empire. He's a cyborg.
![Smilie](/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#4587
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
"Hey, Palpatine! Here is Darth Zero! NOW plain Zero!"
#4588
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
There are so many rumors that contradict each other on this movie that I am starting to think none of them are true.
#4589
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,085
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
^ Bingo. I'll bet word from on-high has been to spread A LOT of disinformation so no one knows what the hell is happening until it hits theaters.
#4590
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
Umm, doesn't that sound a bit too close to a previous Abrams property....
#4591
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
#4592
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I don't believe any of the rumors either. Remember when the bullshit stories about Khan being the villain in Star Trek Into Darkness came out? People overreacted and we got some dude named John Harrison instead.
Last edited by stvn1974; 10-02-14 at 08:44 PM.
#4593
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
#4594
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
These rumor sites are claiming they've all been getting the same info from several sources and have corroborated it with leaked concept art (which they refuse to post) showing the scenes in question. But honestly, how hard would it be for Abrams to hire someone to leak phony/dated artwork to multiple parties using different aliases. It means nothing until we see the movie. I do love how Badass Digest posted an editorial accusing the guy from the other site of "crossing a line" by running the report about Luke. Like these sites give a crap about anything but clickbait. ![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Spoiler:
Last edited by joe_b; 10-03-14 at 06:39 AM.
#4595
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
These rumor sites are claiming they've all been getting the same info from several sources and have corroborated it with leaked concept art (which they refuse to post) showing the scenes in question. But honestly, how hard would it be for Abrams to hire someone to leak phony/dated artwork to multiple parties using different aliases. It means nothing until we see the movie. I do love how Badass Digest posted an editorial accusing the guy from the other site of "crossing a line" by running the report about Luke. Like these sites give a crap about anything but clickbait. ![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Spoiler:
Anyway, as for the balance, that was tipped when the Sith were all killed off. Thousands of Jedi and only two Sith means the balance scales are way off. The Jedi thought the prophecy of bringing balance to the Force would be a good thing. Well, prophecies aren't always good, you know. This was a bad prophecy, for them at least. Anakin did bring balance to the Force when he killed the Jedi. Only two Jedi survived, Obi-Wan and Yoda. Now there are two Jedi and two Sith. The Force is balanced again.
However, the prophecy did not say it would be permanent balance, only that the Chosen One would bring balance. Anakin did bring balance, but nowhere was it stated that he would bring permanent balance. The scales were again tipped when Obi-Wan, Vader, and the Emperor died. Luke is the sole Jedi and the Sith are extinct. (Or maybe the Sith aren't extinct depending on how Episode VII goes.)
Edit to add: I just thought of something. Regarding my earlier statement about the balance with two Jedi (Obi-Wan and Yoda) and two Sith (Vader and Sidious), well what if there were actually three of each instead of two? The new Rebels animated series has a main character who is supposedly a Jedi who survived the purge. That makes three Jedi. So maybe a third long-lost Sith will be revealed in Episode VII after all...
Last edited by taffer; 10-03-14 at 09:57 AM.
#4596
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
"Is he not to destroy the Sith and bring balance to the Force?"
Well, technically he did both -- just not in that order.
Last edited by joe_b; 10-03-14 at 10:38 AM.
#4597
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
Yes, this makes sense... except Lucas himself stated on video (I think the clip is in one of the Mr. Plinkett reviews) that Vader destroying the Emperor was the fulfillment of the prophecy. By destroying the Sith (including himself) he brought the Force back into balance. It's as though the Jedi (or George) couldn't grasp what the hell "bring balance" actually meant.
"Is he not to destroy the Sith and bring balance to the Force?"
Well, technically he did both -- just not in that order.
"Is he not to destroy the Sith and bring balance to the Force?"
Well, technically he did both -- just not in that order.
Plus, we know Lucas just makes this shit up as he goes. He says one thing now, and five minutes later he will contradict it by saying something else.
#4598
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
I've always thought that Luke did give in to the Dark Side after Vader taunted him about Liea. He pulls back after he cuts off Vader's hand, but as Yoda said, "Once you start down the Dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny." If JJ follows up on that, Luke could be dealing with the Dark Side without being fully evil himself.
#4599
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
Yes, this makes sense... except Lucas himself stated on video (I think the clip is in one of the Mr. Plinkett reviews) that Vader destroying the Emperor was the fulfillment of the prophecy. By destroying the Sith (including himself) he brought the Force back into balance. It's as though the Jedi (or George) couldn't grasp what the hell "bring balance" actually meant.
"Is he not to destroy the Sith and bring balance to the Force?"
Well, technically he did both -- just not in that order.
"Is he not to destroy the Sith and bring balance to the Force?"
Well, technically he did both -- just not in that order.
#4600
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd
"Balance" doesn't necessarily mean a scale with two equal weights, one on each side. Instead, think of balance like an ecosystem, a water system with the right kinds of plants, the right kinds of fish, the right kinds of insects, that's a "balanced" ecosystem. Now, introduce a new predator, or a fungus that starts to choke out all the life, that ecosystem is now "out of balance". In Star Wars, that's what the Sith are, they're the invasive carp species, or the toxic fungal bloom throwing off the system. When they were removed, that's restoring "balance".