Go Back  (BETA) DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015, Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015, Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-14, 11:01 AM
  #4576  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
rocket1312's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,153
Likes: 0
Received 953 Likes on 674 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by taffer
Spoiler:
Having a prosthetic hand does not make one a cyborg. Cyborg stands for cybernetic organism. It takes much more than just a hand to become a cyborg. Something like Vader once he became more machine than man is what a cyborg would be. Or Robocop.
Spoiler:
Not that it matters, but that's just plain wrong. There's nothing in the definition of cyborg that demands a certain ratio of man to machine.


cyborg
/ˈsaɪˌbɔːɡ/
noun
1.
(in science fiction) a living being whose powers are enhanced by computer implants or mechanical body parts
Old 10-02-14, 11:02 AM
  #4577  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by taffer
Spoiler:
Having a prosthetic hand does not make one a cyborg. Cyborg stands for cybernetic organism. It takes much more than just a hand to become a cyborg. Something like Vader once he became more machine than man is what a cyborg would be. Or Robocop.
That's the sci-fi conception of a cyborg. The actual definition is someone with mechanical or electronic body augmentation. A more restrictive definition says that the augmentation needs to provide feedback to the person's brain. Luke's hand does that -- Luke flinches when the droid pokes his hand at the end of Empire. He's a cyborg.
Old 10-02-14, 11:10 AM
  #4578  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,767
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

I always thought Andy would be playing a villain. He'd be a great Yuuzhan Vong.

Rumors have been all over the place.

I thought Luke was a captive? Or being hunted by Sith and Empire?
Old 10-02-14, 11:20 AM
  #4579  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
joe_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,390
Received 91 Likes on 58 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
That's the sci-fi conception of a cyborg. The actual definition is someone with mechanical or electronic body augmentation. A more restrictive definition says that the augmentation needs to provide feedback to the person's brain. Luke's hand does that -- Luke flinches when the droid pokes his hand at the end of Empire. He's a cyborg.
Spoiler:
Semantics aside, the spoilers definitely indicate Luke is "more machine now than man", even wearing cybernetic face plates. Ugh.

Last edited by joe_b; 10-02-14 at 11:37 AM.
Old 10-02-14, 12:30 PM
  #4580  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,712
Received 1,130 Likes on 890 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
One red flag that is popping up for me is that it might be too similar to ANH.

Also not liking that it looks like we're going back to Tattoine for a sixth time.
I don't really mind if the film is somewhat similar to A New Hope I guess. It seems like a good way to re-start the franchise and is better than the alternative of it being too similar to the prequels and I'm sure they don't want to start with darker themes right off the bat like the original sequels (more The Empire Strikes Back).

As for Tatooine even though there are other planets I'd like to see explored I think that's going to show up often just because its where everything all started and like someone mentioned about roots I think that play will always tie the universe (or at least the Skywalker family) together.
Old 10-02-14, 12:33 PM
  #4581  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Josh-da-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Bible Belt
Posts: 43,820
Received 2,694 Likes on 1,858 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

I've got a bad feeling about this.
Old 10-02-14, 12:34 PM
  #4582  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Kal-El's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 7,992
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

I seriously doubt JJ would go that story route or that KK would even green light that. You'd be alienating pretty much all of Star Wars fans at that point, even more so than all 3 prequel films combined did.

So yeah, I don't believe it.
Old 10-02-14, 12:36 PM
  #4583  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,712
Received 1,130 Likes on 890 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Honestly I have a hard time believing that rumor is true. Abrams has to know that pulling shit like that will piss people off. That's George Lucas prequel trilogy bullshit if its true.
Old 10-02-14, 12:57 PM
  #4584  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by inri222
http://www.totalfilm.com/news/david-...rn-of-the-jedi

David Cronenberg explains why he turned down Return Of The Jedi

...A long time ago I was approached for one second to do a Star Wars movie, which at that time was called Revenge Of The Jedi and then became Return Of The Jedi.
I was approached by Lucasfilm about that and it didn't take them long to realize that maybe that wasn't a good idea. You're really restricted by the format that's been established.
So for a really inventive or innovative director, that's being put in a straitjacket. And the visual style has been established and the characters have been cast - I mean,
you're not involved in casting the leads, which is of course, for a director, a hugely important thing...
I think Cronenberg is so intellectually idiosyncratic that he'd have trouble with any major studio film. I just don't think he could deal with the demands of making a blockbuster. Hardly a bad thing. I'm amazed he manages to get funding for most of his projects, to be honest.

Wasn't David Lynch seriously talked about for ROTJ? Wasn't Marquand basically picked so that Lucas could sort of have more creative control, as well as because of the Guild controversies?

Incidentally, apparently Paul Verhoeven, who of course later went on to have a long career making sci-fi action movies, was apparently approached based on the strength of his Dutch work, I think Soldier of Orange in particular. Apparently, they were more reticent after seeing Turkish Delight, Verhoeven say he thinks maybe they were concerned that "the Jedi would start fucking right away." Still probably would've been better than the Ewoks.
Old 10-02-14, 02:52 PM
  #4585  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18,354
Received 324 Likes on 242 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
That's the sci-fi conception of a cyborg. The actual definition is someone with mechanical or electronic body augmentation. A more restrictive definition says that the augmentation needs to provide feedback to the person's brain. Luke's hand does that -- Luke flinches when the droid pokes his hand at the end of Empire. He's a cyborg.
You are correct sir. Even "The Six Million Dollar Man" is a cyborg...in fact, it's based on a novel CALLED "Cyborg," so there you go.
Old 10-02-14, 02:54 PM
  #4586  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 10,027
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Maybe Luke's first line will be "Come with me if you want to live."
Old 10-02-14, 05:30 PM
  #4587  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 39,273
Received 605 Likes on 467 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

"Hey, Palpatine! Here is Darth Zero! NOW plain Zero!"
Old 10-02-14, 06:10 PM
  #4588  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,493
Received 197 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

There are so many rumors that contradict each other on this movie that I am starting to think none of them are true.
Old 10-02-14, 06:41 PM
  #4589  
DVD Talk Legend
 
islandclaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,085
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

^ Bingo. I'll bet word from on-high has been to spread A LOT of disinformation so no one knows what the hell is happening until it hits theaters.
Old 10-02-14, 08:00 PM
  #4590  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by TGM
I don't mind Tattooine again. I kind of like the concept of some dusty jerkwater planet burdened by fate (or some other higher power) that habitually causes it to play a pivotal role in the affairs of the galaxy.
Umm, doesn't that sound a bit too close to a previous Abrams property....
Old 10-02-14, 08:12 PM
  #4591  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
fumanstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 55,349
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by TGM
I don't mind Tattooine again. I kind of like the concept of some dusty jerkwater planet burdened by fate (or some other higher power) that habitually causes it to play a pivotal role in the affairs of the galaxy.
Originally Posted by thebunk
Umm, doesn't that sound a bit too close to a previous Abrams property....
Felicity?
Old 10-02-14, 08:20 PM
  #4592  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
stvn1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,316
Received 534 Likes on 334 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

I don't believe any of the rumors either. Remember when the bullshit stories about Khan being the villain in Star Trek Into Darkness came out? People overreacted and we got some dude named John Harrison instead.

Last edited by stvn1974; 10-02-14 at 08:44 PM.
Old 10-03-14, 12:49 AM
  #4593  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by islandclaws
^ Bingo. I'll bet word from on-high has been to spread A LOT of disinformation so no one knows what the hell is happening until it hits theaters.
That's classic Abrams MO.
Old 10-03-14, 05:02 AM
  #4594  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
joe_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,390
Received 91 Likes on 58 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

These rumor sites are claiming they've all been getting the same info from several sources and have corroborated it with leaked concept art (which they refuse to post) showing the scenes in question. But honestly, how hard would it be for Abrams to hire someone to leak phony/dated artwork to multiple parties using different aliases. It means nothing until we see the movie. I do love how Badass Digest posted an editorial accusing the guy from the other site of "crossing a line" by running the report about Luke. Like these sites give a crap about anything but clickbait.

Spoiler:
I don't really believe it, but the only valid reason I could see for Luke turning to the dark side would be to protect his loved ones (namely Leia) from something. That's definitely his Achilles heel. Even then, it feels lazy and contrived. Evil Luke, I could deal with. Darth Luke the killer cyborg? GTFO.

Another thing to chew on: What would this mean for the overall "prophecy" that Lucas pulled out of his ass for the prequel trilogy? Someone, somewhere, foretold of a person who would bring "balance" to the Force. Balance implies symmetry, equal parts... a yin and yang. So, good cannot exist without evil. In Episode I, the Jedi by far outweighed the Sith. How would destroying the remaining Sith provide balance? Perhaps if the prophecy had been to bring "purity to the Force" it might have made sense.

So Palpatine destroys the Jedi, now the Sith are in control -- and since they are a bunch of power-hungry tyrants, there can be only two at a time... to, uh, avoid a power coup or something. The balance between good and evil is still out of whack. Vader kills Palpatine and sacrifices himself in the process, effectively (by Lucas' logic) fulfilling the prophecy by eliminating the last known Sith in the galaxy. Again, this brings "balance" how? I don't think any amount of explanation makes it seem less stupid. Unless Palpatine didn't follow his own rules, having a long-lost apprentice of Darth Sidious pop up doesn't really work. Having a Sith fanatic (as Adam Driver's character was described) who is looking to revive an extinct order makes a bit more sense in the scheme of things. How Luke might factor in to this is anyone's guess.

Last edited by joe_b; 10-03-14 at 06:39 AM.
Old 10-03-14, 09:50 AM
  #4595  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by joe_b
These rumor sites are claiming they've all been getting the same info from several sources and have corroborated it with leaked concept art (which they refuse to post) showing the scenes in question. But honestly, how hard would it be for Abrams to hire someone to leak phony/dated artwork to multiple parties using different aliases. It means nothing until we see the movie. I do love how Badass Digest posted an editorial accusing the guy from the other site of "crossing a line" by running the report about Luke. Like these sites give a crap about anything but clickbait.

Spoiler:
I don't really believe it, but the only valid reason I could see for Luke turning to the dark side would be to protect his loved ones (namely Leia) from something. That's definitely his Achilles heel. Even then, it feels lazy and contrived. Evil Luke, I could deal with. Darth Luke the killer cyborg? GTFO.

Another thing to chew on: What would this mean for the overall "prophecy" that Lucas pulled out of his ass for the prequel trilogy? Someone, somewhere, foretold of a person who would bring "balance" to the Force. Balance implies symmetry, equal parts... a yin and yang. So, good cannot exist without evil. In Episode I, the Jedi by far outweighed the Sith. How would destroying the remaining Sith provide balance? Perhaps if the prophecy had been to bring "purity to the Force" it might have made sense.

So Palpatine destroys the Jedi, now the Sith are in control -- and since they are a bunch of power-hungry tyrants, there can be only two at a time... to, uh, avoid a power coup or something. The balance between good and evil is still out of whack. Vader kills Palpatine and sacrifices himself in the process, effectively (by Lucas' logic) fulfilling the prophecy by eliminating the last known Sith in the galaxy. Again, this brings "balance" how? I don't think any amount of explanation makes it seem less stupid. Unless Palpatine didn't follow his own rules, having a long-lost apprentice of Darth Sidious pop up doesn't really work. Having a Sith fanatic (as Adam Driver's character was described) who is looking to revive an extinct order makes a bit more sense in the scheme of things. How Luke might factor in to this is anyone's guess.
Regarding the whole prophecy thing, my take on it is that the Force used to be balanced. There were thousands of Jedi and thousands of Sith. Then the Sith War happened and all the Sith were killed off except for Bane. (Darth Bane is canon because he is mentioned in the Clone Wars animated series.) Bane is the one who introduced the Rule of Two. The ancient Sith killed themselves off with in-fighting, so the Rule of Two was supposed to prevent that from happening again since there would always be only two Sith, the master and his apprentice. The apprentice would learn and grow and eventually become more powerful than his master and kill him. Then the apprentice becomes the master and takes on his own apprentice to repeat the cycle. That way the dark side keeps getting stronger and stronger as each cycle would have more powerful Sith.

Anyway, as for the balance, that was tipped when the Sith were all killed off. Thousands of Jedi and only two Sith means the balance scales are way off. The Jedi thought the prophecy of bringing balance to the Force would be a good thing. Well, prophecies aren't always good, you know. This was a bad prophecy, for them at least. Anakin did bring balance to the Force when he killed the Jedi. Only two Jedi survived, Obi-Wan and Yoda. Now there are two Jedi and two Sith. The Force is balanced again.

However, the prophecy did not say it would be permanent balance, only that the Chosen One would bring balance. Anakin did bring balance, but nowhere was it stated that he would bring permanent balance. The scales were again tipped when Obi-Wan, Vader, and the Emperor died. Luke is the sole Jedi and the Sith are extinct. (Or maybe the Sith aren't extinct depending on how Episode VII goes.)

Edit to add: I just thought of something. Regarding my earlier statement about the balance with two Jedi (Obi-Wan and Yoda) and two Sith (Vader and Sidious), well what if there were actually three of each instead of two? The new Rebels animated series has a main character who is supposedly a Jedi who survived the purge. That makes three Jedi. So maybe a third long-lost Sith will be revealed in Episode VII after all...

Last edited by taffer; 10-03-14 at 09:57 AM.
Old 10-03-14, 10:32 AM
  #4596  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
joe_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,390
Received 91 Likes on 58 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by taffer
Anakin did bring balance to the Force when he killed the Jedi. Only two Jedi survived, Obi-Wan and Yoda. Now there are two Jedi and two Sith. The Force is balanced again.
Yes, this makes sense... except Lucas himself stated on video (I think the clip is in one of the Mr. Plinkett reviews) that Vader destroying the Emperor was the fulfillment of the prophecy. By destroying the Sith (including himself) he brought the Force back into balance. It's as though the Jedi (or George) couldn't grasp what the hell "bring balance" actually meant.

"Is he not to destroy the Sith and bring balance to the Force?"

Well, technically he did both -- just not in that order.

Last edited by joe_b; 10-03-14 at 10:38 AM.
Old 10-03-14, 10:50 AM
  #4597  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by joe_b
Yes, this makes sense... except Lucas himself stated on video (I think the clip is in one of the Mr. Plinkett reviews) that Vader destroying the Emperor was the fulfillment of the prophecy. By destroying the Sith (including himself) he brought the Force back into balance. It's as though the Jedi (or George) couldn't grasp what the hell "bring balance" actually meant.

"Is he not to destroy the Sith and bring balance to the Force?"

Well, technically he did both -- just not in that order.
Well, considering Lucas also gave us things such as ewoks and Jar Jar and a 10 year old Baby Vader, I am pretty sure Lucas has been getting high off his own supply. I prefer my own theory.

Plus, we know Lucas just makes this shit up as he goes. He says one thing now, and five minutes later he will contradict it by saying something else.
Old 10-03-14, 11:12 AM
  #4598  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

I've always thought that Luke did give in to the Dark Side after Vader taunted him about Liea. He pulls back after he cuts off Vader's hand, but as Yoda said, "Once you start down the Dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny." If JJ follows up on that, Luke could be dealing with the Dark Side without being fully evil himself.
Old 10-03-14, 03:39 PM
  #4599  
DVD Talk Legend
 
milo bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 18,271
Received 1,396 Likes on 1,024 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by joe_b
Yes, this makes sense... except Lucas himself stated on video (I think the clip is in one of the Mr. Plinkett reviews) that Vader destroying the Emperor was the fulfillment of the prophecy. By destroying the Sith (including himself) he brought the Force back into balance. It's as though the Jedi (or George) couldn't grasp what the hell "bring balance" actually meant.

"Is he not to destroy the Sith and bring balance to the Force?"

Well, technically he did both -- just not in that order.
"Balance" doesn't necessarily mean a scale with two equal weights, one on each side. Instead, think of balance like an ecosystem, a water system with the right kinds of plants, the right kinds of fish, the right kinds of insects, that's a "balanced" ecosystem. Now, introduce a new predator, or a fungus that starts to choke out all the life, that ecosystem is now "out of balance". In Star Wars, that's what the Sith are, they're the invasive carp species, or the toxic fungal bloom throwing off the system. When they were removed, that's restoring "balance".
Old 10-03-14, 03:52 PM
  #4600  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015, D: Abrams) S: Hamill, Ford, Fisher, Serkis, von Syd

Originally Posted by milo bloom
"Balance" doesn't necessarily mean a scale with two equal weights, one on each side. Instead, think of balance like an ecosystem, a water system with the right kinds of plants, the right kinds of fish, the right kinds of insects, that's a "balanced" ecosystem. Now, introduce a new predator, or a fungus that starts to choke out all the life, that ecosystem is now "out of balance". In Star Wars, that's what the Sith are, they're the invasive carp species, or the toxic fungal bloom throwing off the system. When they were removed, that's restoring "balance".
The invasive species example doesn't really work. The Force isn't just a small ecosystem that's one small part of a whole. The Force is everything. It is life itself. The dark side has always existed as part of the Force just as the light side has. Good and evil are necessary opposites, like hot and cold or solid and liquid.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.